Clarifying the Calculation of Apparent and Actual Depth

  • Thread starter Thread starter nblu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the "actual" depth in a problem involving apparent depth, with a specific focus on the relevance of the given unit of measurement, "1.0m." Participants are exploring the implications of this measurement in the context of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of the "1.0m" measurement in the calculations, with some expressing confusion about its relevance. There is also an attempt to clarify the context of the problem through a diagram.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's understanding and clarifying points of confusion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the diagram, and there is an exploration of different interpretations of the problem's parameters.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a previous inquiry on the same question, which may influence the current discussion. The relevance of the "1.0m" measurement is under scrutiny, indicating potential assumptions that need to be addressed.

nblu
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-77612.html

here's a link to the same question which has already been inquired
before by someone else.

according to the question, it asks to calculate the "actual" depth
and once I have read all the replies on that page, the author seemed to
calculate the answer. I've tried it myself and acquired the same answer.
However, I'm a little confused with the given unit "1.0m" in the question.
Is it just there to confuse the reader? because it has not been included in
any of the calculations.

Sorry for posting too many questions :(
and thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite understanding your concern. All the distances in the problem are given in meters.
 
Doc Al said:
I'm not quite understanding your concern. All the distances in the problem are given in meters.

oh what I meant was,
was that 1.0m necessary for calculating the final answer?
 
Ah... Are you referring to the statement: "She estimates that her eyes are about 1.0m above the water's surface"?

If so, then no, that fact seems irrelevant to the problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your diagram looks good to me.
 
Doc Al said:
Your diagram looks good to me.
Thank you doc
I really appreciate your help! :)
have a good weekend
 
My pleasure.
 

Similar threads

How Is the Refractive Index Calculated from Apparent and Real Depths?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
High School Apparent Depth - What remains constant?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Calculating RI of Oil w.r.t Air with Apparent Depth of Liquid
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Actual Depth and Apparent Depth
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
30K
Graduate Thin lens approximation and Apparent depth
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Undergrad Find Well Depth from Time Taken to Hear Stone Hit Bottom
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
A simple Proper Time Calculation
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Lifting an object, kinetic energy, work and forces
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
[Special Relativity] Lorentz Transformation and Boosts
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Distance Time Graph: Acceleration & Velocity Calculation
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K