I Classic 'Double-Slit' Experiment Using Time Instead of Space

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the article about recreating the classic double-slit experiment using time instead of space, referencing a specific paper on time diffraction at optical frequencies. Participants express skepticism about the novelty of the findings, suggesting that the excitement may be overstated. While the fast optics involved in the experiment are acknowledged as interesting, doubts remain about whether this truly advances the field of light modulation. Comparisons are made to neutrino oscillation experiments, indicating that similar concepts have been explored previously. Overall, the conversation questions the significance of the new approach in the context of established physics.
sbrothy
Gold Member
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
1,178
TL;DR
Physicists Recreate Classic 'Double-Slit' Experiment Using Time Instead of Space
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the go-fast optics in the actual paper is a lot of fun and the result is satisfying. I dont know whether this expands the state of the art for modulating light fastly (fastly being a Trumpism).
The rest of the hype is just silly IMHO.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and sbrothy
I suspected as much. Thank you.
 
sbrothy said:
is there actually anything new in it?
That's effectively what neutrino oscillation experiments have been doing for decades.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, vanhees71 and hutchphd
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
658
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K