vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,102
- 20
slyboy said:Bohmian mechanics is a good example of the kind of thing I am talking about. There your ontic state (state of reality) is just the particle positions and the quantum state vector. You just have an ordinary Kolmogorv distribution over particle positions.
Yes, this is the part of Bohmian mechanics that is sufficient to show that you do not NEED any "quantum probability rules" that go beyond Kolmogorov probability ; the very fact that it is possible to construct a model that gives you the same predictions as QM using Kolmogorov probability is sufficient to show that. Don't understand me wrong: I didn't want to say that Bohmian mechanics must therefore be "right" or whatever ; it is just that the very existence of that model, giving QM probabilities, and obeying Kolmogorov probabilities, disproves the statement that you cannot have QM probabilities satisfying Kolmogorov's axioms.
However, there are perfectly good Kolmogorov distributions over position that are not allowed in this theory, since they have to obey the ``equilibrium hypothesis'' in order to agree with the predictions of QM, i.e. the prob. distribution must be the one coming from the Born rule applied to the state vector.
Yes, this is correct ; however, it doesn't invalidate the claim that QM probabities CAN be generated by a system obeying Kolmogorov's axioms. If that system can also generate other probabilities (not those of QM) doesn't matter. The very fact that with the right distributions, you DO get out the QM predictions, is enough.
Just as a side note: this doesn't mean I endorse Bohmian mechanics. I have mixed feelings towards it, my main complaint being that the guiding equations do not obey the imposed symmetries on the wave dynamics (like Lorentz invariance). But I do think that it is very useful to study Bohmian mechanics because it is a model that disproves a lot of claims about QM, like the one we're discussing here, namely that "quantum probabilities" are somehow not "normal probabilities as we know them" (Kolmogorov axioms).
cheers,
Patrick.