Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer

  • I
  • Thread starter vancouver_water
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Classical
In summary, the paper discusses how a classical black hole can be used as a randomizer and how Bob can access the information contained in Alice's message without having to decode it. This is made possible by the randomness of the black hole and the lack of correlation between bits in the bit string. Despite the difficulty of decoding classical error correcting codes, Bob can still access the information with only ##k+c## bits.
  • #1
vancouver_water
77
10
TL;DR Summary
Why is it possible for Bob to decode Alices ##k##-bit message after only reading ##k+c##
I am reading this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4025. In section 2, they describe a classical black hole as a classical randomizer. The black hole initially is a ##n-k## bit string, and Alice sends a ##k##-bit string into the black hole. A permutation of all ##2^n## possible strings is the state after the black hole thermalizes. Bob then receives ##k+c## bits via radiation, and it is assumed that Bob knows exactly the dynamics of the black hole. They claim that Bob can decode Alices message with high probability with only ##k+c## bits. But there are classical error correcting codes that make it very difficult to decode a message even will all bits, so how is this possible?

The only solution I can think of is that Bob can't necessarily decode the message but only that with ##k+c## bits the information contained in the message is still there. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you are missing is that Bob does not need to decode the message in order to access the information contained in it. Bob can use the randomness of the black hole to extract the information without decoding it. In other words, Bob can use the randomness of the black hole to gain access to the message's content without having to decode it. This is possible because the black hole's randomness makes it so that no two positions in the bit string are correlated with each other. This allows Bob to access the information contained in the bits without having to decode them.
 

1. What is the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer?

The Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer is a theoretical concept in quantum information theory proposed by physicists Patrick Hayden and John Preskill. It refers to a hypothetical machine that can take a classical input and produce a random classical output, with the added feature that the output is completely unpredictable even to an observer who knows the input and the inner workings of the machine.

2. How does the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer work?

The exact workings of the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer are still a topic of research and debate. However, the general idea is that the machine would use quantum entanglement and other quantum phenomena to generate a truly random output that is impossible to predict or replicate.

3. What is the significance of the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer?

The Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer has important implications for cryptography and information security. If such a machine could be built, it would provide an unbreakable method for generating truly random encryption keys, making it virtually impossible for hackers or other adversaries to decipher sensitive information.

4. Has the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer been successfully demonstrated?

No, the Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer is still a theoretical concept and has not yet been successfully demonstrated in practice. However, researchers are actively working on developing new quantum technologies that could potentially lead to the creation of such a machine.

5. Are there any potential limitations or challenges to building a Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer?

Yes, there are several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed before a Classical Hayden-Preskill Randomizer can be built. These include the difficulty of controlling and manipulating quantum systems, as well as the potential for errors and noise in the output. Additionally, the cost and resources required for building such a machine may also be a limiting factor.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
769
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
735
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
1K
Back
Top