Classical limit of the commutator is a derivative?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
I just came across the following claim:

[tex]\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[\frac{1}{\hbar}(AB-BA)][/tex]

(which approaches the classical Poincare commutator) is a derivative with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex]. I know it looks like derivative, but is it really? Please elaborate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pellman said:
I just came across the following claim:

[tex]\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[\frac{1}{\hbar}(AB-BA)][/tex]

(which approaches the classical Poincare commutator) is a derivative with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex]. I know it looks like derivative, but is it really? Please elaborate.

The commutator can be generally written as a series

[tex][A,B] = i \hbarK_1 + i\hbar^2K_2 + i \hbar^3 K^3 + \ldots[/tex]

where [tex]K_i[/tex] are Hermitian operators. This follows simply from the fact that [A,B] is antiHermitian and that it must tend to zero as [tex]\hbar \rightarrow 0[/tex]. So the limit

[tex]-\frac{i}{\hbar}\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[A,B] = K_1[/tex]

(which is the classical Poisson bracket of A and B) can be regarded as the derivative of [A,B] with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex] at [tex]\hbar \rightarrow 0[/tex].

Eugene.
 
Very cool. Thanks, Eugene!