Classical limit of the commutator is a derivative?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the commutator as \(\hbar\) approaches zero, expressed as \(\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[\frac{1}{\hbar}(AB-BA)]\), converges to the classical Poincaré commutator and can be interpreted as a derivative with respect to \(\hbar\). The commutator can be represented as a series: \([A,B] = i \hbar K_1 + i\hbar^2 K_2 + i \hbar^3 K^3 + \ldots\), where \(K_i\) are Hermitian operators. As \(\hbar\) approaches zero, the limit \(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[A,B] = K_1\) indicates that this limit behaves like the classical Poisson bracket of \(A\) and \(B\), confirming its derivative nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operators
  • Familiarity with the concept of commutators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, specifically Poisson brackets
  • Basic calculus, particularly limits and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the Poincaré commutator
  • Learn about the relationship between quantum commutators and classical Poisson brackets
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of limits in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and mathematicians interested in the relationship between quantum and classical mechanics, particularly those studying the implications of commutators and derivatives in quantum theory.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
I just came across the following claim:

[tex]\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[\frac{1}{\hbar}(AB-BA)][/tex]

(which approaches the classical Poincare commutator) is a derivative with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex]. I know it looks like derivative, but is it really? Please elaborate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pellman said:
I just came across the following claim:

[tex]\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[\frac{1}{\hbar}(AB-BA)][/tex]

(which approaches the classical Poincare commutator) is a derivative with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex]. I know it looks like derivative, but is it really? Please elaborate.

The commutator can be generally written as a series

[tex][A,B] = i \hbarK_1 + i\hbar^2K_2 + i \hbar^3 K^3 + \ldots[/tex]

where [tex]K_i[/tex] are Hermitian operators. This follows simply from the fact that [A,B] is antiHermitian and that it must tend to zero as [tex]\hbar \rightarrow 0[/tex]. So the limit

[tex]-\frac{i}{\hbar}\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0}[A,B] = K_1[/tex]

(which is the classical Poisson bracket of A and B) can be regarded as the derivative of [A,B] with respect to [tex]\hbar[/tex] at [tex]\hbar \rightarrow 0[/tex].

Eugene.
 
Very cool. Thanks, Eugene!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K