Classical Mechanics by Kibble Berkshire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The book "Classical Mechanics" by Kibble and Berkshire is not suitable for beginners, as it is designed for graduate or advanced senior-undergraduate students. It is characterized as one of the most abstract texts at the senior undergraduate level, making it less ideal for those new to classical mechanics. Reviews indicate that it should not be used as a substitute for introductory texts like Halliday/Resnick or Kleppner/Kolenkow, which are more appropriate for first-year physics courses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of undergraduate-level physics concepts
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics terminology
  • Knowledge of advanced mathematical techniques used in physics
  • Experience with other classical mechanics textbooks such as Halliday/Resnick or Kleppner/Kolenkow
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the book "Classical Mechanics" by Halliday/Resnick for foundational knowledge
  • Explore "Classical Mechanics" by Kleppner/Kolenkow for a more accessible approach
  • Study "Classical Mechanics" by Marion/Thornton for upper-division coursework
  • Investigate reviews and discussions on advanced classical mechanics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone seeking to understand the appropriate level of classical mechanics texts for their studies or teaching curriculum.

tridianprime
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
I was recommended this by a friend. I'm going to get K&K but I was wondering what you thought of this book if you have read it. Is it good for beginners? Comprehensive? General comments?

Thank you,

Tridian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Has anyone read it? Is it not very commonly used? It is used in Imperial College London where Kibble works and ICL is one if the top in the country so does that say anything?
 
I've never read it, but judging from the reviews on Amazon:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1860944353/?tag=pfamazon01-20

it's not an introductory book, but rather intended for graduate or advanced senior-undergraduate level.

This is basically the most abstract classical mechanics book at the senior undergraduate level. While there are merits to this abstractness, it's not the best book to use when you're first starting to learn upper-division CM.

this book is not an introductory college text or anything equivalent

I would not consider it as a substitute for Halliday/Resnick or similar first-year physics textbooks, or even Kleppner/Kolenkow. Note that "upper-division CM" in the first quote refers to books on the level of Marion/Thornton or Fowles/Cassiday, which are commonly used for junior/senior year undergraduate CM courses.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K