Classical mechanics: orbits, force, potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle of mass m moving along the orbit defined by the equation r = a cos(θ), where a is greater than zero. Participants are exploring the forces acting on the particle and the potential energy associated with its motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the force acting on the particle using a potential energy formula and expresses uncertainty about the validity of their result. Some participants question the dependence of the final result on parameters like L and a, suggesting that these should not appear in the final expression. Others discuss the implications of removing constants from the potential energy function and how that affects the resulting forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for simplifying the expressions and questioning the assumptions made in the original calculations. There is a recognition that the problem may involve multiple interpretations, particularly regarding the relationship between the parameters and the potential energy.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the treatment of constants in the potential energy function and the relationship between angular momentum and the parameters involved. The original poster expresses a lack of confidence in their understanding of the problem, seeking further clarification on the equations and concepts discussed.

rmfw
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a particle of mass m moves on the orbit r= a cos(θ), a>0.

Find the force acting on the particle

The Attempt at a Solution



I had this formula in my notebook:U(r)= E-(L^2/2mr^2)(1+(1/r^2)(dr/dθ)^2)

Using it I got U(r)=E-L^2a^2/2mr^4

and F(r)=-dU/dr= (-5L^2a^2/2mr^5) \overline{r}

I would really appreciate if someone could confirm my result. I can't find other way to solve it but something smells fishy. Thanks!

edit: I will detail it a bit more

This is how I got the result

dr/dθ=-a sen(θ)
(dr/dθ)^2= a^2 sen(θ)^2 = a^2(1-cos(θ)^2)=(a^2-r^2), then I just plugged this on the formula I'v written.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The final result should not depend on the particle, so L and a should not be there. And you can remove the E, the offset of the potential does not matter.
A 1/r^4-potential looks good. I'm not sure about the 4, but we had a similar problem here a while ago, and I think it was 4.

Edit: This is the reverse problem
 
mfb said:
The final result should not depend on the particle, so L and a should not be there.
Edit: This is the reverse problem

How can I make them disappear?
 
Find a in terms of L for your particle (or vice versa), put it there. That might lead to one parameter you cannot solve for, then let this stay unknown.
 
mfb said:
Find a in terms of L for your particle (or vice versa), put it there. That might lead to one parameter you cannot solve for, then let this stay unknown.

I'm sorry but I'm not very good at this, can you provide me some equations that I should focus on to get such result? And I still don't understand what do you mean with "you can remove E", wouldn't that give a different result to the potential?
 
rmfw said:
I'm sorry but I'm not very good at this, can you provide me some equations that I should focus on to get such result?
Hmm, I guess this is not necessary. You probably get a circle for every constant prefactor of the potential. Just invent a new variable for L^2 a^2 /(2m).

And I still don't understand what do you mean with "you can remove E", wouldn't that give a different result to the potential?
If two potentials differ by a constant, they lead to the same forces and therefore the same physics. Therefore, any added constant in the potential is arbitrary. You can simply remove it to make the formula shorter.
 
So what you are saying is, for example:

κ=L^2 a^2/2m

and so:

U(r)=-κ/r^4
and
F(r)=-κ/r^5

Also, help for finding the particle energy and angular momentum knowing that velocity= V when r=a, please.
 
rmfw said:
Also, help for finding the particle energy and angular momentum knowing that velocity= V when r=a, please.
What is the kinetic energy of a particle with velocity V? The potential energy is just given by your potential. For angular momentum, you have to find the angle between particle velocity and r.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Can i assume that when r=a r and v are perpendicular and thus L= amV ?
 
  • #10
r=a r does not make sense. v and r are perpendicular when the radius is maximal.
 
  • #11
I should have separated the sentence with a comma. I didn't meant r=a r, I meant r and v are perpendicular when r=a, which is the maximum radius like you said. Thanks !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K