Classical Mechanics: Textbook Recs & Study Tips

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for introductory classical mechanics textbooks and study tips for the course, particularly focusing on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Participants share their experiences and challenges with the material, exploring both theoretical and practical aspects of learning classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express difficulty with classical mechanics concepts, particularly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, and seek recommendations for textbooks.
  • One participant suggests that Lagrangian mechanics involves subtracting potential energy from kinetic energy and solving second order differential equations, while another corrects this to emphasize the second order nature of the equations.
  • Textbook recommendations include Marion & Thornton, Goldstein, Hand & Finch, Gregory, Kibble, and various advanced texts like Jose/Saletan and Greiner.
  • Participants share study tips, such as completing assigned homework, working through solved examples, and reading ahead.
  • There is a discussion about the perceived difficulty of Kibble compared to Marion & Thornton, with some participants noting that Kibble lacks examples and solutions, making it challenging for students.
  • One participant mentions that their friends found Kibble difficult, attributing some of the challenges to the course structure, including the number of exams.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness of different textbooks, with some favoring Marion & Thornton for its concrete examples, while others criticize Kibble for its lack of support materials. There is no consensus on which textbook is definitively better, and experiences with the course vary widely.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that some textbooks may require a strong mathematical background, particularly in differential geometry, which could influence their accessibility for students. The discussion reflects a variety of personal experiences and preferences regarding study methods and textbook choices.

diffusion
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I can already tell this semester is going to be a rough one. With two weeks until the semester begins, I've been attempting to work through the notes for my classical mechanics course (lagrangian & hamiltonian mechanics). Wow. Really dense stuff. I'm having a pretty difficult time following the concepts, and the textbook they've prescribed cannot be found anywhere. So, I've started this thread for two reasons:

1) Could anyone recommend a decent introductory classical mechanics textbook(s)?

2) I'd like to hear your experiences with classical mechanics. Is it really a difficult course? Any study tips you could share?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will probably be easier with explanation from the instructor. Lagrangian really isn't so bad... you basically subtract the potential energy from the kinetic and solve a 1st order differential equation for the motion.

As for textbooks, my first intro to L+H was Marion & Thornton, it seemed to work alright. My second time through it was Goldstein, also alright.
 
Marion & Thornton and Hand & Finch are two good books for first-time Classical Mechanics.

As Mororvia points out, the Lagrangian is generally the difference between kinetic and potential energies (there can be cases where it's not, though you'll likely not see them in your first time through) and will be solving one second order differential equations, not first order (it's [itex]D_t^2x=-\omega^2x[/itex], not [itex]D_tx=-\omega^2x[/itex]!).
The Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics is usually the total energy (it is not the total energy if the Lagrangian depends on time explicitly) and you'll be solving two first order differential equations.

Tips for doing well:
--Do all the homework the professor assigns
--Do problems the professor doesn't assign for help
--Read ahead always
--Work out the solved examples in your text on your own & compare results
--Don't be afraid to ask questions
 
Oops. Yes, second order. Thats what I get for not reviewing after its been so long! Sorry for any confusion.
 
I have made a thread on online CM resources:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=349852My generic booklist for CM would be:

Begginer:
Classical Mechanics-Gregory
Classical Mechanics-Kibble

Intermediate:
Classical Dynamics-Jose/Saletan
Mechanics-Scheck
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics-Arnold(if you dare)

EDIT: What is your obscure book, anyway?
 
Pinu7 said:
Intermediate:
Classical Dynamics-Jose/Saletan
Mechanics-Scheck
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics-Arnold(if you dare)

You are brave to call Jose/Saletan & Arnold "Intermediate." We used Jose/Saletan for my graduate mechanics course and I don't understand much of it (fortunately, I had Marion & Thornton, Greiner, and Goldstein at my disposal to learn the mechanics part and Frankel's Geometry of Physics to learn the differential geometry part). I would label these "Advanced" with emphasizing a lot of mathematical background, specifically differential geometry.

Now that I mention it, the Greiner series and Landau/Lifschitz series are excellent books for all of their subject areas (I think Greiner is better than Landau b/c the latter tends to be very wordy).
 
How would you compare Kibble to Marion and Thornton? So far, I'm noticing that Marion and Thornton seem more useful for specific problems since it seems to have more concrete examples. Especially on things like many-body systems
 
Simfish said:
How would you compare Kibble to Marion and Thornton? So far, I'm noticing that Marion and Thornton seem more useful for specific problems since it seems to have more concrete examples. Especially on things like many-body systems

a lot of my physics major friends took CM with the Kibble book and hated it, the professor specifically chose Kibble because it didn't have a lot of examples nor a solutions manual and my friends all found it very difficult to study for the course (though the fact the professor gave 6 exams not including the final might've had something to do with it).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K