Classify the given second-order linear PDE

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on classifying second-order linear partial differential equations (PDEs) using the discriminant method, specifically the formula ##b^2 - 4ac##. The participants confirm that a discriminant value of ##-24## indicates an elliptic PDE. They compare this approach with a textbook method that modifies the discriminant to ##4ac - b^2##, emphasizing that both methods yield the same classification despite differences in presentation. The consensus is that both approaches are valid for determining the nature of second-order linear PDEs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear partial differential equations
  • Familiarity with the discriminant formula ##b^2 - 4ac##
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical modifications in equations
  • Experience with elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic classifications of PDEs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the discriminant in PDE classification
  • Explore the differences between elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic PDEs
  • Review advanced textbooks on partial differential equations for alternative classification methods
  • Practice solving second-order linear PDEs using both the discriminant and modified approaches
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as educators seeking to understand various methods of classifying PDEs.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
420
Homework Statement
Classify the second order linear pde, given by;

##U_t +2U_{tt}+3U_{xx}=0##
Relevant Equations
use of discriminant
Now i learned how to use discriminant i.e ##b^2-4ac## and in using this we have;
##b^2-4ac##=##0-(4×3×2)##=##-24<0,## therefore elliptic.

The textbook has a slight different approach, which i am not familiar with as i was trained to use the discriminant at my undergraduate studies...
see textbook approach here;

1638669547425.png


and the textbook solution is here;
1638669780842.png
and i also checked wikipedia on this and they have used the discriminant approach. See the approach here; ( i am comfortable with this approach)
1638669617986.png


Both approaches should be fine, one can use either approach...correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The textbook is the same thing with some math modifications

1.) Instead of ##b^2-4ac## they have ##4ac-b^2## so the sign is flipped

2.) They write ##2b## as the coefficient instead of ##b##. So given that the coefficient of the cross term is called ##2b##, their discriminant becomes
##4ac-(2b)^2=4(ac-b^2)##. Since 4 is positive, the sign of the discriminant is determined by ##ac-b^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
Office_Shredder said:
The textbook is the same thing with some math modifications

1.) Instead of ##b^2-4ac## they have ##4ac-b^2## so the sign is flipped

2.) They write ##2b## as the coefficient instead of ##b##. So given that the coefficient of the cross term is called ##2b##, their discriminant becomes
##4ac-(2b)^2=4(ac-b^2)##. Since 4 is positive, the sign of the discriminant is determined by ##ac-b^2##.
ooooh, Thanks am trying to refresh on pde's cheers mate...:cool:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K