Classify the given second-order linear PDE

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Pde
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
Classify the second order linear pde, given by;

##U_t +2U_{tt}+3U_{xx}=0##
Relevant Equations
use of discriminant
Now i learned how to use discriminant i.e ##b^2-4ac## and in using this we have;
##b^2-4ac##=##0-(4×3×2)##=##-24<0,## therefore elliptic.

The textbook has a slight different approach, which i am not familiar with as i was trained to use the discriminant at my undergraduate studies...
see textbook approach here;

1638669547425.png


and the textbook solution is here;
1638669780842.png
and i also checked wikipedia on this and they have used the discriminant approach. See the approach here; ( i am comfortable with this approach)
1638669617986.png


Both approaches should be fine, one can use either approach...correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The textbook is the same thing with some math modifications

1.) Instead of ##b^2-4ac## they have ##4ac-b^2## so the sign is flipped

2.) They write ##2b## as the coefficient instead of ##b##. So given that the coefficient of the cross term is called ##2b##, their discriminant becomes
##4ac-(2b)^2=4(ac-b^2)##. Since 4 is positive, the sign of the discriminant is determined by ##ac-b^2##.
 
Office_Shredder said:
The textbook is the same thing with some math modifications

1.) Instead of ##b^2-4ac## they have ##4ac-b^2## so the sign is flipped

2.) They write ##2b## as the coefficient instead of ##b##. So given that the coefficient of the cross term is called ##2b##, their discriminant becomes
##4ac-(2b)^2=4(ac-b^2)##. Since 4 is positive, the sign of the discriminant is determined by ##ac-b^2##.
ooooh, Thanks am trying to refresh on pde's cheers mate...:cool:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top