Clebsch-Gordan coefficients calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for the states j1=3/2 and j2=1/2 using recursion formulas and raising/lowering operators. Participants emphasize the importance of starting with states that are proportional to each other, specifically |3/2,3/2⟩ and |1/2,1/2⟩, leading to |2,2⟩ = |3/2,3/2⟩ |1/2,1/2⟩. The allowed values of total angular momentum J are derived from the sum of j1 and j2, adhering to the triangle rule for magnetic quantum numbers. The discussion also highlights common pitfalls in applying lowering operators and calculating coefficients accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
  • Familiarity with angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of raising and lowering operators
  • Proficiency in using recursion formulas in quantum calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients using the Wigner 3-j symbols
  • Learn about the application of the triangle rule in angular momentum coupling
  • Explore the use of the lowering operator in quantum state transformations
  • Practice calculating Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for various j1 and j2 combinations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on angular momentum coupling and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients calculations.

abcs22
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So i have to calculate the Clebsch-gordan coefficients for the state j1=3/2 and j2=1/2[/B]

Homework Equations


Recursiom formula, lowering and uppering operator[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to calculate the first set of the coefficients stating that:
L- l2,2> = L- l3/2,1/2>l1/2,1/2>

For the left side I got that it is equal to 2hl2,1>. Is that correct? I can't get the right coefficients on the right side. In general, I have trouble understanding which combinations of j and m to use tobget what I have to do. Is there some procedure to get all of them in order? Right now I am trying to guess what to use and see if I get the right combination.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abcs22 said:
For the left side I got that it is equal to 2hl2,1>. Is that correct?
Yes.

abcs22 said:
I can't get the right coefficients on the right side.
You should start from the states in the two representations which are proportional to each other. One of such states are ##|3/2,3/2\rangle |1/2,1/2\rangle## and ##|2,2\rangle##. Therefore, ##|2,2\rangle = c|3/2,3/2\rangle |1/2,1/2\rangle##. The constant of proportionality ##c## is in general a unimodular complex number, but conventionally it is chosen to be ##1##. Thus ##|2,2\rangle = |3/2,3/2\rangle |1/2,1/2\rangle##. Then apply the lowering operator on both sides like you have done and in the RHS, use ##L_- = L_{1-}+L_{2-}##.
 
Last edited:
abcs22 said:
For the left side I got that it is equal to 2hl2,1>. Is that correct?

Yes, assuming that h means ##\hbar##.

abcs22 said:
In general, I have trouble understanding which combinations of j and m to use tobget what I have to do. Is there some procedure to get all of them in order?
Given that you are adding together ##j_1## and ##j_2##, then the allowed values of ##J## are
$$
J = j_1 + j_2, j_1+j_2 - 1, \ldots, \left| j_1 - j_2 \right|
$$
Second, the triangle rule has to be followed: ##M = m_1 + m_2##. So in the case you have, the result will have to be 0 since ##M = 2## while ##m_1+m_2 = 1##.
 
Thank you! I got the first ones:
I2,1> =√3/2 I1/2,1/2> + 1/2 I3/2,-1/2>

Is that ok? I tried applying lowering again on this expression but didn't get the solution. How do I know where to use the operator next?
 
abcs22 said:
Is that ok?
If that square root applies only on the 3 in the numerator, then it's fine.
abcs22 said:
I tried applying lowering again on this expression but didn't get the solution. How do I know where to use the operator next?
Why won't it work? To get |2,0> you should indeed apply the lowering operator once more on both sides. Maybe you just made a mistake during calculation.
 
abcs22 said:
Thank you! I got the first ones:
I2,1> =√3/2 I1/2,1/2> + 1/2 I3/2,-1/2>
That's not correct, check the values of ##j_!## and ##j_2##.
 
DrClaude said:
That's not correct, check the values of ##j_!## and ##j_2##.
Actually he is using ##|m_1,m_2\rangle## notation on the RHS while the values of ##j_1## and ##j_2## are only implied.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Actually he is using ##|m_1,m_2\rangle## notation on the RHS while the values of ##j_1## and ##j_2## are only implied.
Right o:) Nevermind...
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K