Closed and bounded in relation to compact

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between closed and bounded sets in topology, emphasizing that a set is closed if it contains all its limit points, while a set is bounded if it can be contained within a finite interval. The real numbers, denoted as \(\mathbb{R}\), are closed but not bounded, whereas the interval [0,1) is bounded but not closed. It is established that in metric spaces, compact subsets are both closed and bounded, but this does not hold in non-metric spaces, such as the rational numbers. The conversation highlights that compact sets are closed in any topology, particularly in Hausdorff spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topology concepts, including closed sets and bounded sets.
  • Familiarity with metric spaces and their properties.
  • Knowledge of convergent sequences and their limits.
  • Awareness of Hausdorff spaces and compactness in topology.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of compact sets in metric spaces.
  • Learn about Hausdorff spaces and their significance in topology.
  • Explore examples of closed and bounded sets in various topological spaces.
  • Investigate the concept of least upper bounds and their application in real analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational concepts of closed and bounded sets in various mathematical contexts.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
So this is more so a general question and not a specific problem.

What exactly is the diefference between closed and boundedness?

So the definition of closed is a set that contains its interior and boundary points, and the definition of bounded is if all the numbers say in a sequence are contained within some interval. But isn't that the same thing as being closed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbb{R} is closed but not bounded.
[0,1) is bounded but not closed.

Do these examples help?
 
It can be proved that any compact subspace of a metric space (you need the metric to define "bounded") is both closed and bounded. Any subset of the real numbers (or, more generally, Rn) that is both closed and bounded is compact. But in other spaces, such as the Rational numbers with the metric topology, that is not true. And, of course, you can have compact sets in non-metric spaces where "bounded" cannot be defined (though compact sets are still closed in any topology).
 
HallsofIvy said:
(though compact sets are still closed in any topology).

Compact sets are only closed in Hausdorff topologies.
 
micromass said:
\mathbb{R} is closed but not bounded.
[0,1) is bounded but not closed.

Do these examples help?


So what your examples are saying that R has some finite value (though we can never find it) at which R will end, but it is not within an interval?

I see the concept in the second example though.
 
trap101 said:
So what your examples are saying that R has some finite value (though we can never find it) at which R will end, but it is not within an interval?

You need to brush up on your definitions, closed doesn't mean that at all.
 
bounded means that distances can not exceed a bound. R is not bounded because there are points of arbitrarily large distance away from each other. [0,1) is bounded because no two points can get more than a distance of 1 away from each other.

on the real line closed means that every convergent sequence converges inside the set. So all of R must be closed since it is the whole set. But [0,1) is not closed because the sequence

1/2, 3/4, 7/8, 15/16 ... is inside the set but it converges to 1 which is outside the set.
 
lavinia said:
bounded means that distances can not exceed a bound. R is not bounded because there are points of arbitrarily large distance away from each other. [0,1) is bounded because no two points can get more than a distance of 1 away from each other.

on the real line closed means that every convergent sequence converges inside the set. So all of R must be closed since it is the whole set. But [0,1) is not closed because the sequence

1/2, 3/4, 7/8, 15/16 ... is inside the set but it converges to 1 which is outside the set.



Ok. I understand now what it means to be closed, but bounded is still a little fuzzy. When it comes to the bound, is the bound something that we select in order for our aribitrary distance to be satisfied?
 
"Bounded" means there is an upper bound on distances between points.
 
  • #10
trap101 said:
Ok. I understand now what it means to be closed, but bounded is still a little fuzzy. When it comes to the bound, is the bound something that we select in order for our aribitrary distance to be satisfied?

there is an idea of a least upper bound which is the smallest number that bounds the distances between pairs of points. But larger numbers are also bounds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K