Closed and bounded in relation to compact

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concepts of closedness and boundedness in the context of set theory and topology, exploring their definitions, implications, and relationships, particularly in metric spaces. Participants examine examples and clarify misunderstandings related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that closed sets contain their interior and boundary points, while bounded sets are those where all points are contained within some interval.
  • Examples are provided, such as \(\mathbb{R}\) being closed but not bounded, and \([0,1)\) being bounded but not closed, to illustrate the differences.
  • It is noted that any compact subspace of a metric space is both closed and bounded, but this does not hold in all spaces, such as the rational numbers.
  • One participant emphasizes that compact sets are only guaranteed to be closed in Hausdorff topologies.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of boundedness, with some participants asserting that it means distances cannot exceed a certain bound, while others express confusion about the concept.
  • Clarifications are made regarding convergent sequences and their relation to closed sets, particularly in the case of \([0,1)\) where a convergent sequence can converge to a point outside the set.
  • Questions arise about the nature of bounds, including the idea of a least upper bound and the selection of bounds for distances between points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the definitions of closed and bounded sets. While some points are clarified, there remains uncertainty and disagreement about the implications and nuances of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of definitions and the dependence on specific topological contexts, such as metric versus non-metric spaces.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
So this is more so a general question and not a specific problem.

What exactly is the diefference between closed and boundedness?

So the definition of closed is a set that contains its interior and boundary points, and the definition of bounded is if all the numbers say in a sequence are contained within some interval. But isn't that the same thing as being closed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbb{R} is closed but not bounded.
[0,1) is bounded but not closed.

Do these examples help?
 
It can be proved that any compact subspace of a metric space (you need the metric to define "bounded") is both closed and bounded. Any subset of the real numbers (or, more generally, Rn) that is both closed and bounded is compact. But in other spaces, such as the Rational numbers with the metric topology, that is not true. And, of course, you can have compact sets in non-metric spaces where "bounded" cannot be defined (though compact sets are still closed in any topology).
 
HallsofIvy said:
(though compact sets are still closed in any topology).

Compact sets are only closed in Hausdorff topologies.
 
micromass said:
\mathbb{R} is closed but not bounded.
[0,1) is bounded but not closed.

Do these examples help?


So what your examples are saying that R has some finite value (though we can never find it) at which R will end, but it is not within an interval?

I see the concept in the second example though.
 
trap101 said:
So what your examples are saying that R has some finite value (though we can never find it) at which R will end, but it is not within an interval?

You need to brush up on your definitions, closed doesn't mean that at all.
 
bounded means that distances can not exceed a bound. R is not bounded because there are points of arbitrarily large distance away from each other. [0,1) is bounded because no two points can get more than a distance of 1 away from each other.

on the real line closed means that every convergent sequence converges inside the set. So all of R must be closed since it is the whole set. But [0,1) is not closed because the sequence

1/2, 3/4, 7/8, 15/16 ... is inside the set but it converges to 1 which is outside the set.
 
lavinia said:
bounded means that distances can not exceed a bound. R is not bounded because there are points of arbitrarily large distance away from each other. [0,1) is bounded because no two points can get more than a distance of 1 away from each other.

on the real line closed means that every convergent sequence converges inside the set. So all of R must be closed since it is the whole set. But [0,1) is not closed because the sequence

1/2, 3/4, 7/8, 15/16 ... is inside the set but it converges to 1 which is outside the set.



Ok. I understand now what it means to be closed, but bounded is still a little fuzzy. When it comes to the bound, is the bound something that we select in order for our aribitrary distance to be satisfied?
 
"Bounded" means there is an upper bound on distances between points.
 
  • #10
trap101 said:
Ok. I understand now what it means to be closed, but bounded is still a little fuzzy. When it comes to the bound, is the bound something that we select in order for our aribitrary distance to be satisfied?

there is an idea of a least upper bound which is the smallest number that bounds the distances between pairs of points. But larger numbers are also bounds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K