[tex] [/tex]I am using Lang's book on complex analysis, i am trying to reprove theorem 4.1 which is a simple theorem:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let [tex] Compact(S \in \mathbb{C}) \iff Closed(S) \land Bounded(S)[/tex]

I will show my attempt on one direction of the proof only, before even trying the other direction.

The first

- Assume S is compact
- Idea for bounded: Show by contradiction that if S is unbounded then there will be a sequence with no accumulation point in S. (same idea i think of the book, but i don't get his method)
- Idea for closed: Show that given a boundary point, you could construct a sequence that is in S that converges to that boundary point, and then show it's a point of accumulation of the sequence. Since it's compact then the boundary point is in S, then it's closed.

Assume S is compact, but not bounded.

The second

- Let the sequence [tex] \{Z_n\} := n |(w)|[/tex], where [tex]w[/tex] is an accumulation point for the set S. We can pick any multiplier we want, since S is unbounded.
- Let the set [tex] E:=\{Z_n, Z_n\in Disk(center=w,rad=\epsilon=|w|)\} [/tex]
- S is finite since less and less points of Z_n as n grows
- A contradiction, so S is bounded

Assume S is compact, B a boundary point of S, now i want to create sequence that converges to B, and given it's compact then whatever it converges to is in S.

- Let the sequence [tex] \{z_n\}:= \frac{B}{1+\frac{1}{n}} [/tex]
- Let the set [tex]E:= \{ z_n | |z_n-B|<\epsilon\}[/tex]
- Need to show that the set E is infinite, but i have no idea what to do

Come to think of this, i think both ideas are on the proper track logically, but the execution is terribly shitty, can someone tell me if 1 is right? and how do i show 2.3 given that the prior steps are correct.

I mean, in the second, how do i know that the sequence, defined as it is, is actually in S.

Where am i going wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Proof check: S in C Compact implies S is closed and bounded

Tags:

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proof check Compact | Date |
---|---|

B Did President Garfield really come up with an alternate proof? | Mar 7, 2018 |

Square numbers between n and 2n -- Check my proof please | Aug 21, 2015 |

Can you check my proof by induction? | Sep 6, 2012 |

Can someone please check my working to this proof | Mar 20, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**