gracy
- 2,486
- 83
what is definition of closed packing?a close packing plane is a plane that the atoms cannot be packed any closer?
The discussion centers around the definition of closed packing, particularly in relation to the arrangement of atoms as spheres in both three-dimensional and two-dimensional contexts. Participants explore the implications of the term "close packing" and its geometric significance.
Participants express varying interpretations of the terms "closed packing" and "close packing," with no consensus reached on a singular definition. The discussion includes both agreement on the geometric principles involved and differing views on the necessity of considering atoms as spheres.
Some limitations include the ambiguity surrounding the definitions of closed packing versus close packing, as well as the implications of treating atoms as spheres versus other shapes. The discussion also highlights the potential for confusion when transitioning between 2D and 3D contexts.
That's "close packing,", not "closed." Yes, it means that atoms, taken as spheres, cannot be closer to one-another. See http://departments.kings.edu/chemlab/animation/clospack.htmlgracy said:what is definition of closed packing?a close packing plane is a plane that the atoms cannot be packed any closer?
atoms have to be sphere? in definition word sphere is present?DrClaude said:it means that atoms, taken as spheres, cannot be closer to one-another.
what about 2D?is close packing not applied in 2D?DrClaude said:, i.e., how to arrange spheres in 3D
Yes, you can apply it to 2D. It is just that crystal lattices are usually 3D. I'm sorry if I led you astray by discussing spheres in 3D. But the links I gave also discuss the 2D case.gracy said:what about 2D?is close packing not applied in 2D?
Thanks a lot.May God bless you.DrClaude said:Yes, you can apply it to 2D. It is just that crystal lattices are usually 3D. I'm sorry if I led you astray by discussing spheres in 3D. But the links I gave also discuss the 2D case.