Closest distance of approach between 2 charged particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The closest distance of approach between two charged particles is determined by equating their kinetic energy and potential energy. The derived formula shows that the closest distance, denoted as r2, is half of the initial distance r, specifically r2 = 30 cm when r is 60 cm. The discussion highlights the importance of using conservation of energy principles and acknowledges the oversight of constant acceleration in the initial approach. The final solution confirms that integrating or using conservation of energy is essential for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations for constant acceleration
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Basic calculus for integration concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Coulomb's law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about kinematic equations and their limitations in variable acceleration scenarios
  • Explore conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Practice integration techniques relevant to physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of charged particles and their interactions through electrostatic forces.

Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Homework Statement
Two identical point charges are moving in free space, when they are 60 cm apart, their velocities are equal in magnitude and make angles of 45 degrees from the line joining them as shown in the figure. If at this instant their total kinetic energy is equal to their potential energy, what will be the distance of closest approach between them? (Source: YouTube video; Name: Electrostatics | Advanced Problem | Closest Distance of Approach Between Two Charged particles)
Relevant Equations
$$v_f = v_i - at$$
$$s = v_ot - \frac {at^2} 2$$
$$F = ma$$
1719764874931.png

A few hours ago, I tried solving this problem and I'm still not quite sure if I've made a mistake somewhere or perhaps the guy in the video is wrong? Anyway, here's my solution:

In the problem we're given that the total kinetic energy of of these 2 charges at this instant(look at the picture) is equal to their potential energy, thus we can write:$$\sum E_k=Ep$$ $$2 \frac {mv_o^2} 2 =k \frac {q^2} r$$ Simplifying this we get $$mv_o^2 = k \frac {q^2} r , (1)$$

The speed of one particle in the y direction is going to stay constant during the whole interaction because the force on the particles does work only in the x direction. So we can write $$v_y=v_{oy}=v_o \cos ⁡45^{\circ}=v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}}2$$ Now the x direction. The initial velocity in the x direction is equal to the initial velocity in the y direction(magnitude). Both of these particles are going to decelerate due to the electrostatic force acting on both particles $$F_e=k \frac {q^2} {r^2}$$ By the second Newton's law, we get that the acceleration is, $$a=k\frac {q^2} {mr^2}$$ When the magnitude of velocities of these 2 particles reaches zero, we get the closest distance of approach. By plugging that into the kinematics equation we get, ##v_i=at##, or $$v_{ox}=at \iff v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2=at \iff v_o \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2=k\frac {q^2} {mr^2} t$$ $$\iff t = \frac {\sqrt{2}} 2 \frac{v_o m r^2} {kq^2}$$Using the second kinematics equation we will get the distance covered by one of the particles, $$s=v_{ox}t−\frac {at^2} 2$$, or $$s=\frac{\sqrt{2}} 2 v_o t−\frac {at^2} 2$$ Plugging in for ##t## and ##a## and simplifying we get $$s=\frac{1} 2 \frac {v_o^2mr^2}{kq^2}−\frac {1} 4 \frac {v_o^2mr^2} {kq^2}$$ From this we get $$s=\frac {1} 4 \frac {mv_o^2 r^2}{kq^2}$$ Now comes the equation we derived above (1). By substituting, we get $$s=\frac {1} 4 \frac {k \frac {q^2} {r} r^2} {kq^2}$$ Or $$s=\frac{1} 4 r$$ Both particles are going to travel the same distance thus the closest distance of approach is going to be $$r_2=r−2s \iff r_2=r−2\frac {1} 4 r \iff r_2=r−\frac {1} 2 r \iff r_2=\frac {1} 2 r \iff r_ 2=\frac {1} 2 60cm \iff r_2=30cm$$ In the video the guy somehow got $$r_2=\frac {2} 3 r$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There was a glitch. It will take me some time to convert this back to latex. I refreshed the page and everything crashed.
 
You are using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration. Is the acceleration constant?
 
kuruman said:
You using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration. Is the acceleration constant?
Ah, I completely overlooked that. I guess I'll have to integrate or perhaps I could try setting up an equation for conservation of energy since net external force is 0. I would really like to try integrating this, but I haven't done much calculus. Would an integral in this problem be hard to solve?
 
What is "this" that you want to integrate and why? Just equate the mechanical energy at the moment shown in the figure with the mechanical energy at the moment of closest approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Heisenberg7
kuruman said:
What is "this" that you want to integrate and why? Just equate the mechanical energy at the moment shown in the figure with the mechanical energy at the moment of closest approach.
Never mind. I got the solution using conservation of energy. Thank you for pointing out my mistake!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and kuruman
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
796
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K