Closing a door by throwing something at it

  • Thread starter Thread starter LocalStudent
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of closing a door by throwing a tennis ball versus a lump of sticky clay, both having the same mass. It concludes that while the clay transfers its kinetic energy to the door upon impact, it retains some kinetic energy after sticking, making it less effective than the tennis ball in an elastic collision scenario. In contrast, the tennis ball, upon bouncing back, allows the door to acquire greater velocity due to the principles of conservation of momentum and energy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding elastic and inelastic collisions in classical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Explore the conservation of momentum and energy in one-dimensional collisions
  • Analyze real-world applications of collision theory in physics
  • Investigate the effects of mass and velocity on collision outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and energy transfer in mechanical systems.

LocalStudent
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Just say I decide to close my door by throwing a tennis ball or a lump of sticky clay at the door. Both have the same mass.

I would say throwing the lump of sticky clay would be more effective.

Is this due to the conservation of momentum or kinetic energy?
Because the clay does not bounce back and therefore all the kinetic energy of the clay goes into moving the door.. <- would this be the conservation of kinetic energy and is my reasoning correct?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your door. If the clump/ball has about the same mass as the door and friction is negligible, then, no, the elastic collision (the tennis ball) would be more effective. When the clump sticks to the door, and both swing shut, the clump still has kinetic energy because it is still moving. This means that there is still energy in the clump that has not been transferred to the door. If the door has no initial friction and starts at rest, (and the thrown object has about the same mass as the door) then all of the energy from the thrown object will be transferred to the door. After the elastic collision, the tennis ball will be at rest and the door will be moving. Think Newton's Cradle. A tennis ball is a bad visual because it is so light. A better comparison would be a basketball versus a sticky clump of clay.
 
chrisbaird said:
A tennis ball is a bad visual because it is so light. A better comparison would be a basketball versus a sticky clump of clay.

So what if you were comparing the effects of the 50g tennis ball and a 50g lump of clay?
 
LocalStudent said:
Because the clay does not bounce back and therefore all the kinetic energy of the clay goes into moving the door.
In real life some energy will go into deforming the clay, of course, but that can be ignored here. Regarding kinetic energy, after the clay sticks to the door, it will still be moving, and so it will still have kinetic energy. Just think of this as a collision in one dimension, and solve the general case elastically and inelastically.
 
If you work it out using the classical laws of conservation of mass and conservation of energy, you will find that when one mass (the ball) collides with a second mass that is initially at rest (the door), the second mass will acquire twice the velocity in a perfectly elastic collision (bouncing) that it would in a perfectly inelastic collision (sticking). This result is exact (within classical mechanics) and general, no matter what the masses of the objects are or the initial velocity. Go ahead and work out the ratio velastic/vinelastic using the conservation laws and you will find everything cancels in the end leaving only the number 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K