Closing Remarks: Love is Key to Conservation

  • Thread starter Thread starter iron~orchid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Home
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "love" as it relates to conservation efforts, particularly in the context of a recent conference. Participants explore the implications of integrating emotional and relational aspects into scientific research and conservation practices, touching on both theoretical and practical dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the mention of love at a scientific congress suggests a shift in the approach to conservation, though the nature of this change is uncertain.
  • One participant humorously reflects on the inevitability of change, suggesting it permeates all aspects of life.
  • Another participant speculates that if love is to be researched by biologists, it may ultimately be framed as a mechanistic phenomenon.
  • A claim is made that science is fundamentally about disproving hypotheses rather than proving them, indicating a philosophical stance on the nature of scientific inquiry.
  • One participant raises the idea that humor in responses may serve to address the taboo nature of discussing love in scientific contexts.
  • A detailed observation is shared regarding the use of guardian dogs in livestock protection, emphasizing that their protective behavior is linked to a complex emotional bond rather than aggression, which is framed as a form of love.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the role of love in scientific discourse and conservation, with no clear consensus on its implications or how it should be integrated into research practices.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of love and its relationship to behavior and conservation practices, which remain unresolved. The interplay between emotional and mechanistic interpretations of love in science is also noted but not definitively addressed.

iron~orchid
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
A professional Biologist assigned the responsibility of making closing remarks at a recent conservation conference reviewed the important issues discussed throughout the conference and insights into the future direction of research and left us with this take home message:

... as he noticed the word Love was brought up as a factor in several of the concurrent sessions, he stated,

"Love being mentioned at a scientific congress means change is in the air.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
But change is very rarely towards the thing you expect, or wish for.
 
Change is in the air.:wink:

Change is everywhere.
Its no use trying to stay the same.
Its no use, you can change your name.
Change will find you just the same.

Change is in the air.

And its in your hair.
Its in the way you walk.
And the way you talk.

Change is in the air.

Its also anaerobic.

Change is makin' it all transparent.
Change is an unruley parent.
Change is takin' over parliment.
Change is servin' you a warrant.

Change is in the air.

(DJ Carl In The House!eh!)
 
Just noting that if a biologist talks about love as the next line of research, the chances are, the change will be towards proving it to be a purely mechanistic effect.:wink:
 
Science is nothing more than a way of knowing -- but it is not the only way of knowing.

Science cannot prove anything -- if doing the job right -- the scientists are trying to disprove every hypothesis.

------------
 
Sure. I know you are wrong. :wink:
 
Not to scold, but I find it most interesting that both replies used humoresque responses.

IS that to cross the barriers of such a taboo subject such as love ?

The integrity of mentioning its use in scientific terminology does not help your mapping it to some type of St. Valentine's proposal brought on by Cupid's arrow.

Behavior and attitude toward this love subject is due to a deep groove in the brain where the neurons are tied into a loop and locked into the physical structure of your body due to these repeated thoughts becoming habits, beliefs and judgments that you associate with.

It is extremely hard to modify these loops or grooves of mind-body communication but is it possible if you are aware of it.

-------------------------- To continue:

At the referenced Scientific Congress, my observation highlighted love factoring in when I listened to an analysis of use of guardian dogs for controlling predation in pastoral economies. Their use is in recognition of Wolf conservation initiatives where the rancher normally would want to kill the predator.

The dogs are trained by raising them within an enclosed environment with a herd of livestock where they have little human contact prior to their release with the herd into the pasture. The relationship with the livestock is then "voluntary" by the dog as it remains with the herd and consciously protects it from wildlife predation.

Why I noted "love" as a necessary factor in this type scenario is that the researcher/trainer mentioned that these guardian dogs DO NOT need and SHOULD NOT be "aggressive" in nature. The reason for their protectiveness of the herd stems out of a more complex link -- LOVE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 197 ·
7
Replies
197
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K