CMB Angular Distribution: Understanding Gaussian Random Fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and its angular distribution being modeled as a Gaussian random field (GRF). Participants seek clarification on the origins of this classification and the geometric implications of GRFs. They reference key CMB data from COBE, WMAP, and PLANCK, emphasizing the importance of the CMB power spectrum in analysis. The conversation also highlights the need for a deeper understanding of GRFs, with participants sharing various resources for further study. Ultimately, the discussion aims to unravel the mechanisms that allow the CMB to be approximated as a Gaussian random field.
Madster
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I don't understand why the Cosmic Microwave Background's angular distribution is considered to to a Gaussian random field initially.
The rest of the analysis is roughly clear to me, COBE/WMAP/PLANCK measure the CMB Photons and show the temperature fluctuations w.r.t. the mean temperature. On this data a spherical analysis is applied... But where does the GRF come from? What is b.t.w. a geometrical meaning of a GRF?

Thank you very much
 
Space news on Phys.org
Mordred said:
This article may help you hope your math is good lol

http://www.astro.rug.nl/~weygaert/tim1publication/lss2007/computerIII.pdf

the main usage in the CMB is in measurements of the CMB power spectrum.

thanks, my math is sufficient enough to get the script. So still what mechanism makes the CMB a gaussian random field, or to be more precise, let's us initially approximate the description with a GRF and look for fluctuations?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top