Coefficient of drag of an object in water

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of determining the coefficient of drag for wind turbine rotors submerged in water, as existing data primarily focuses on air. The lateral forces on turbine towers from water currents are compared to those from wind, highlighting the need for relevant drag coefficients in aquatic environments. Participants note that while a wind turbine has a drag coefficient of about 0.9 in air, it remains unclear if similar values apply in water. The conversation also touches on the potential for small-scale applications, such as micro water turbines for home use, and the significance of Reynolds numbers in comparing fluid dynamics in different mediums. Overall, the need for more research and data on drag coefficients in water is emphasized.
bigdummy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm working on an idea that has to do with placing wind turbines on lake beds to catch the constant undercurrents (not a wholy original idea, I know). One of the most important factors to take into consideration is the lateral force exerted on the tower by the current--which is identical to the force exerted by the wind on a wind turbine tower. The only problem is that there is a lot of information that can be found on the coefficient of drag of a spinning rotor in a gaseous fluid (air), whereas I really haven't been able to come across much information regarding the coefficent of drag of a rotor (in motion) submersed in a liquid (such as water). For example, a wind turbine has a coefficent of drag of about .9 while rotating. And the maximum value for an object (such as a parachute) in air is around 1.5. Would these values hold true for the medium of water? Is there some explanation that limits the coefficient of drag to a value of less than 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found something that may be of help to you in the design of the blades themselves. It seemed that the design you might be considering was similar to that of a boat's outdrive, so I went to one of the more popular manufacturers and found this page from http://www.mercurymarine.com/chapter_4_-_propeller_technology .

Also found another paper http://web.mit.edu/13.012/www/handouts/propellers_reading.pdf that gives equations on figuring out the different properties and other design considerations.

Out of curiosity, are you thinking large scale application, or a portable source for boaters or others near water?

Akula
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the Reynold's number is similar in two applications, then the coefficients of drag will be close.
 
In regards to the Reynold's number, aren't they totally different for water and air? And as for the question regarding the application of this information: I'm much more interested in small scale production. Sure, large-scale power generation is where all the money is, but who can do the R&D for something like that in their garage?

Sidenote: There is supposedly this Dutch firm that has come up with a micro water turbine that is small enough to fit inside of the water pipes of a home and can still generate about 1.5V. Now that's not a whole lot of power, I realize, but it's something. I'd really like to play with this thing if I could get a hold of it, but it doesn't seem to be on the market anywhere. If you have any inklings, please do inform.
 
bigdummy said:
In regards to the Reynold's number, aren't they totally different for water and air?

Yes, if everything were identical. If you're comparing things of different sizes (but identical shape) moving at different speeds, then the Reynold's number can be similar.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K