Coefficient of kinetic friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the coefficient of kinetic friction in a physics problem involving forces acting on an object on an inclined plane. Participants are examining the equations of motion, specifically how to incorporate acceleration and the effects of friction in the context of Newton's second law.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of equations involving forces, acceleration, and friction. There are questions about the correct signs for the forces and the role of the applied force. Some participants express uncertainty about the setup and the implications of their equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is a focus on clarifying the role of friction and its direction relative to the applied force. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the implications of a negative coefficient of friction and the assumptions made about the forces involved. There is a mention of a free body diagram that could aid in visualizing the problem, but it has not yet been shared.

DonutHole
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
You are pushing a 53kg crate with an acceleration of 1m/s^2 up a ramp. The ramp makes an angle of 22° above the horizontal. If your applied force is 524N, what is the kinetic coefficient of friction between the crate and the ramp?
Relevant Equations
μ = Ff/Fn
Fn = m X g X cos θ
Fnet = Fa – mg sin θ +or- μmg cos θ
Fn = 53 X 9.81 X cos 22
Fnet = 524 – 53 X 9.81 sin 22 + μ X 53 X 9.81 cos 22
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Is that all you've got? What about the solution?
 
PeroK said:
:welcome:

Is that all you've got? What about the solution?
I am not sure how to incorporate the acceleration of 1m/s^2 into the equation.
 
DonutHole said:
I am not sure how to incorporate the acceleration of 1m/s^2 into the equation.
DonutHole said:
Fnet = Fa – mg sin θ +or- μmg cos θ
That equation looks good, although you'll have to decide whether it should be ##+## or ##-##. And shouldn't that just be ##F##? What's the ##a## in ##Fa##?

What about Newton's second law? Isn't that relevant?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
PeroK said:
That equation looks good, although you'll have to decide whether it should be ##+## or ##-##. And shouldn't that just be ##F##? What's the ##a## in ##Fa##?

What about Newton's second law? Isn't that relevant?
I think the equation should be Fa - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ
a in Fa is the acceleration
and Newtons 2nd law says that the external forces applied should equal ma which means that all the components of the equation should equal mass times acceleration?
 
DonutHole said:
I think the equation should be Fa - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ
a in Fa is the acceleration
I don't think I've ever seen ##Fa## in an equation. The dimensions are wrong, as what you have is an equation between forces. You can't have ##Fa## in there.

By having ##+\mu mg \cos \theta## you have friction acting up the slope. Does that look right?

DonutHole said:
and Newtons 2nd law says that the external forces applied should equal ma which means that all the components of the equation should equal mass times acceleration?
Yes, that's a second equation: ##F_{net} = ma##.
 
PeroK said:
By having ##+\mu mg \cos \theta## you have friction acting up the slope. Does that look right.
shouldn't friction be acting towards the bottom of the slope because applied force is acting towards the top?
 
DonutHole said:
shouldn't friction be acting towards the bottom of the slope because applied force is acting towards the top?
In this case, yes, friction is acting down the slope, because the applied force is large enough to accelerate the block up the slope. If the applied force were less, then the block might be trying to slide down the slope with friction opposing the motion.
 
PeroK said:
In this case, yes, friction is acting down the slope, because the applied force is large enough to accelerate the block up the slope. If the applied force were less, then the block might be trying to slide down the slope with friction opposing the motion.
This is my first time doing a question like this so I am not too sure but the equation ma = F - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ is correct? and if that's the case what is F?
 
  • #10
DonutHole said:
This is my first time doing a question like this so I am not too sure but the equation ma = F - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ is correct? and if that's the case what is F?
##F## is the applied force. Note that I guess we should assume that it acts parallel to the ramp.

I'm still not convinced by the sign of that force of friction!
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
##F## is the applied force. Note that I guess we should assume that it acts parallel to the ramp.

I'm still not convinced by the sign of that force of friction!
Yes the applied force is parallel to the ramp.
1635713330605.png

I should have shared this free body diagram earlier
 
  • #12
DonutHole said:
Yes the applied force is parallel to the ramp. View attachment 291503
I should have shared this free body diagram earlier
Okay, apart from having ##Fa## rather than simply ##F## that looks good. Can you finish off this problem? You seem to be nearly there.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
Okay, apart from having ##Fa## rather than simply ##F## that looks good. Can you finish off this problem? You seem to be nearly there.
the answer and step I got are:

ma = F - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ
53(1) = 524 - (53)(9.81)sin22 + μ(53)(9.81)cos22
53 = 329 + 482μ
μ = -0.57

is this correct?
 
  • #14
DonutHole said:
the answer and step I got are:

ma = F - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ
53(1) = 524 - (53)(9.81)sin22 + μ(53)(9.81)cos22
53 = 329 + 482μ
μ = -0.57

is this correct?
I've never heard of a negative coefficient of friction! Maybe you got the sign of the friction force wrong?
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
I've never heard of a negative coefficient of friction! Maybe you got the sign of the friction force wrong?
that's what i thought too maybe it should have been 524 + the rest instead of -?
 
  • #16
DonutHole said:
that's what i thought too maybe it should have been 524 + the rest instead of -?
I would vote for ##-##.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
I would vote for ##-##.
I see so if that isn't the problem what do you think I got wrong?
 
  • #18
Plus = up the slope and minus = down the slope.

Your error is to have friction acting up the slope. E.g.

DonutHole said:
ma = F - mg sinθ + μmg cos θ
 
  • #19
PeroK said:
Plus = up the slope and minus = down the slope.

Your error is to have friction acting up the slope. E.g.
so the equation would be ma = F - mg sinθ - μmg cos θ
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #20
DonutHole said:
so the equation would be ma = F - mg sinθ - μmg cos θ
:partytime:
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
:partytime:
in that case the answer would be 0.57
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
812