Cold shutdown that doesn't require coolant circulation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of a nuclear plant achieving a cold shutdown without requiring coolant circulation. Key points include the necessity of removing decay heat from the reactor core, which is typically managed by systems like the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) and Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS). The Fukushima Unit 1 utilized an Isolation Condenser (IC) system, which is nearly passive but limited in capacity. The conversation highlights the advantages of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system, which can operate without AC power and provides both decay heat removal and water injection, making it a superior choice for safety in nuclear reactor design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactor cooling systems, specifically Residual Heat Removal (RHR) and Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS).
  • Knowledge of decay heat and its implications for reactor safety.
  • Familiarity with the design and operation of Isolation Condenser (IC) and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) systems.
  • Awareness of the operational challenges faced during nuclear emergencies, such as those experienced at Fukushima.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of passive cooling systems in Generation IV nuclear reactors.
  • Study the operational differences between Isolation Condenser (IC) and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) systems.
  • Examine case studies of nuclear incidents, focusing on the lessons learned from the Fukushima disaster.
  • Investigate advancements in nuclear safety training and simulation technologies for reactor operators.
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, safety analysts, and reactor operators will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on improving reactor safety and efficiency in emergency situations.

  • #91
5 years is the requirement for long term storage/dry cask.

there are storage casks that can be used for transport/shipping. Remember a single fuel bundle or even fuel rod has drastically less heat density than a dry storage cask containing 60+ bundles. There is nothing legally that prevents casks from accepting fuel less than 5 years. The cask designer must demonstrate that the cask or container/etc is safe with the number of bundles that have been installed.

When we have failed fuel, typically we disassemble the upper tie plate and we can pull individual rods out. Each individual rod has a barcode etched in, so we record the rod numbers in that bundle, sipe the rods, look for the leaker. get video of it. We can do different ultrasonic techniques or whatever to try and measure what we can. Typically you can tell just by looking at it whether it was internal/external, and get a good idea. If more data is needed that's when you look into moving it to another facility, but in most/all cases that's all you really care about when you have a failed bundle.

Remember, all of this is done under water due to both heat and dose rates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
48
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K