Collapse of building #7 on 9/11

  • Thread starter Thread starter alantheastronomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Collapse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The NIST report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) identifies thermal expansion of a floor beam due to fires as the primary cause of the collapse, specifically disrupting a support column on the thirteenth floor. Additionally, the report outlines three explicitly listed contributing factors and provides over a dozen recommendations for mitigation. The structural damage from the North Tower's debris was determined to have no significant impact on WTC 7's failure. The report emphasizes that the fire conditions alone were sufficient to explain the collapse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion in structural engineering
  • Familiarity with the NIST report on WTC 7
  • Knowledge of fire dynamics and their effects on building materials
  • Awareness of structural integrity concepts in high-rise buildings
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the NIST final report on the collapse of WTC 7 for detailed findings
  • Study the principles of thermal expansion in construction materials
  • Investigate fire safety engineering practices for high-rise buildings
  • Explore case studies on structural failures due to fire and debris impact
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, fire safety professionals, historians studying 9/11, and anyone interested in building safety and failure analysis.

alantheastronomer
Messages
256
Reaction score
77
The official NIST report on the collapse of building 7 on 9/11 states that the thermal expansion of a floor beam due to the fires disrupted a support column on the thirteenth floor, and that is what ultimately caused the building to collapse. Is this the sole cause or could there have been other contributing factors?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
alantheastronomer said:
sole cause or could there have been other contributing factors?
Yes.:sleep:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
alantheastronomer said:
The official NIST report on the collapse of building 7 on 9/11 states that the thermal expansion of a floor beam due to the fires disrupted a support column on the thirteenth floor, and that is what ultimately caused the building to collapse. Is this the sole cause or could there have been other contributing factors?
Have you read the report? There are three additional explicitly listed contributing factors and more than a dozen recommendations for mitigating them and other potential contributing and tangential factors. Your one sentence summary is a good start, but the reality is far more complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
No, I just read the Wikipedia version. What are the contributing factors that you know of? Do you have a link to the report? The reason I'm asking is that when I was listening to the radio when it was happening, they mentioned that building 7, unlike the others in the area, shared a common basement with the twin towers, although I haven't heard mention of this since. This got me to wondering about, when the North Tower collapsed, might it have pressed air into building 7's basement, weakening it's foundation?
 
alantheastronomer said:
they mentioned that building 7, unlike the others in the area, shared a common basement with the twin towers
Looking (quickly) at the report, I see no mention of this common basement when they discuss the connection between building 7 and the rest of the WTC.

alantheastronomer said:
This got me to wondering about, when the North Tower collapsed, might it have pressed air into building 7's basement, weakening it's foundation?
It appears that the report found that the fire was sufficient to explain what happened to building 7. They say that even the structural damage from the debris of the North Tower played no significant role.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K