College-_-'s question at Yahoo Answers regarding a volume by slicing

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving the calculation of the volume of a solid formed by slicing a triangular region with equilateral triangle cross-sections perpendicular to the y-axis. The problem is framed within the context of volume by slicing rather than solids of revolution.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant clarifies that the problem involves volume by slicing, not a solid of revolution, and explains how to find the equation of the line representing the hypotenuse of the triangle.
  • The formula for the area of an equilateral triangle is presented, along with the expression for the volume of an arbitrary slice of the solid.
  • A definite integral is set up to calculate the total volume of the solid, with a substitution method suggested for simplification.
  • Another participant points out a potential error in referring to volume in square units, emphasizing that it should be in cubic units.
  • The original poster acknowledges the correction regarding the units of volume.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to solving the problem, but there is a minor correction regarding the units of volume, which was acknowledged and corrected by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

There are no explicit limitations or unresolved mathematical steps mentioned in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Students studying calculus, particularly those interested in volume calculations and slicing methods, may find this discussion relevant.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Volumes of solids of revolution?


I have a problem in calculus 2 the question is:
"Find the volume V of the described solid S.
The base of S is the triangular region with vertices (0, 0), (4, 0), and (0, 4). Cross-sections perpendicular to the y-axis are equilateral triangles."
I drew a picture of the triangle but don't know how to find the volume. I know that because the cross sections are perpendicular to the y-axis that means it is rotated about the y-axis to get the solid and that the equations of the three lines that make up this triangle are y=0, x=0, and y= -x+4. I read the explanation to a similar problem but it made no sense and didn't help me with figuring out the answer to my problem. What's the answer? How do I solve it?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello College-_-,

First, I want to say the this is a volume by slicing, nor a solid of revolution. We will be slicing or decomposing this solid into volume elements which are slices in the shape of equilateral triangles.

Slicing perpendicular to the $y$-axis, we find the width of the base area $S$ is the $x$-coordinate of the line along with the hypotenuse lies. Knowing the two intercepts of this line are both $4$, we may use the two-intercept form of a line, and then solve for $x$:

$$\frac{x}{4}+\frac{y}{4}=1$$

$$x+y=4$$

$$x=4-y$$

Now, we wish to find the formula for the area of an equilateral triangle as a function of its side lengths $s$:

$$A=\frac{1}{2}s^2\sin\left(60^{\circ} \right)=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}s^2$$

Hence, we may state the volume of an arbitrary slice of the solid as:

$$dV=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}(4-y)^2\,dy$$

Summing all the volume elements, we find the volume of the solid is then given by:

$$V=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\int_0^4 (4-y)^2\,dy$$

Let's use the substitution:

$$u=4-y\,\therefore\,du=-dy$$

and we have:

$$V=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\int_0^4 u^2\,du$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain the volume in units cubed:

$$V=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\left[\frac{u^3}{3} \right]_0^4=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\cdot\frac{4^3}{3}=\frac{16}{\sqrt{3}}$$
 
I'm sure you mean the volume is in CUBIC units, not square :P
 
Prove It said:
I'm sure you mean the volume is in CUBIC units, not square :P

Why yes...yes I did. Thanks for catching that! I have fixed my post above. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K