Collineations of an affine geometry

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samkolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An affine geometry consists of a nonempty set of points A and a set of lines connecting these points. A collineation is defined as a bijection f: A --> A that maps lines to lines, ensuring that if points P and Q are collinear, their images f(P) and f(Q) are also collinear. However, the discussion clarifies that the definition does not guarantee that non-collinear points P and Q will map to non-collinear points f(P) and f(Q). It emphasizes the necessity of including the property that the inverse function f-1 is also a collineation, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of collinearity in affine geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of affine geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with bijections in mathematics
  • Knowledge of collinearity in geometric contexts
  • Basic grasp of inverse functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of affine transformations in geometry
  • Research the implications of bijections in mathematical functions
  • Explore the role of inverse functions in geometric mappings
  • Examine theorems related to collineations in affine spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students studying affine geometry and its properties, particularly those interested in the implications of collineations and their inverses.

samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
An affine geometry is a nonempty set of points A, together with a set of lines, where each line connects one or more of the points in A.

A collineation of A is a bijection f: A --> A that carries lines to lines. That is, if P,Q are points in A lying on the same line, then f(P), f(Q) are points in A lying on the same line.

My question:

Does this definition imply that each pair of points not lying on the same line is carried to a pair of points not on the same line? That is, if P, Q do not lie on the same line, then do f(P) and f(Q) also not lie on the same line?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, this does not follow. The condition says nothing about points which are not collinear. But, and this is somehow missing in the definition of a collineation, what about ##f^{-1}##. You would expect from a collineation as a bijection, that the inverse function is also a collineation. This should have been stated.

So if we assume, that ##f^{-1}## is a collineation, too, then the situation is a different one:
If ##f(P)## and ##f(Q)## are collinear, then ##f^{-1}(f(P))=P## and ##f^{-1}(f(Q))=Q## are collinear because ##f^{-1}## is a collineation. This is equivalent to: If ##P## and ##Q## are not collinear, then ##f(P)## and ##f(Q)## can't be collinear.

Hence we need that ##f^{-1}## is a collineation. This should either be part of the definition, or a theorem proven by other means, will say other axioms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K