MHB Collin's question at Yahoo Answers regarding maximization of beam strength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the strength of a rectangular beam cut from a circular log with a cross-section defined by the equation x^2+y^2=256. The strength of the beam is expressed as S(D,W)=kD^2W, where D is depth and W is width. By applying calculus, the optimal width is determined to be W=32/√3, leading to a corresponding depth of D=32√(2/3). The second derivative test confirms that this critical point represents a maximum for the beam's strength. The solution also mentions the potential use of Lagrange multipliers for a multi-variable approach.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Calculus Max Min Application Problem?


If the strength of a rectangular beam is proportional to the product of its width and the square of its depth, find the dimensions of the strongest beam that could be cut from a log whose cross section is a circle of the form x^2+y^2=256

Please show work, thanks.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Collin,

Let's let $0<W$ be the width (horizontal dimension) of the beam's cross-section and $0<D$ be the depth (vertical dimension). The strength $S$ of the beam is our objective function:

$$S(D,W)=kD^2W$$ where $$0<k\in\mathbb{R}$$ is the constant of proportionality.

The vertices of the beam's cross-section must obviously confined to the circle:

$$x^2+y^2=16^2$$

Hence:

$$W=2x\implies x=\frac{W}{2}$$

$$D=2y\implies y=\frac{D}{2}$$

And so we may write:

$$\left(\frac{W}{2} \right)^2+\left(\frac{D}{2} \right)^2-16^2=0$$

Thus, we may express the constraint as:

$$g(D,W)=D^2+W^2-32^2=0$$

Solving the constraint for $D^2$, we obtain:

$$D^2=32^2-W^2$$

Substituting into the objective function, we find:

$$S(W)=k\left(32^2-W^2 \right)W=k\left(32^2W-W^3 \right)$$

Differentiating with respect to $W$ and equating the result to zero, we find:

$$S'(W)=k\left(32^2-3W^2 \right)=0$$

Taking the positive root, we obtain the critical value:

$$W=\frac{32}{\sqrt{3}}$$

Using the second derivative test to determine the nature of the extremum associated with this critical value, we find:

$$S''(W)=-6kW$$

Since $$0<W$$ then $$S''(W)<0$$ demonstrating that we have found a relative maximum of the objective function. Hence, the dimensions which maximize the beam's strength are:

$$D\left(\frac{32}{\sqrt{3}} \right)=\sqrt{32^2-\left(\frac{32}{\sqrt{3}} \right)^2}=32\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}$$

$$W=\frac{32}{\sqrt{3}}$$

We could also use a multi-variable technique, Lagrange multipliers.

We have the objective function:

$$S(D,W)=kD^2W$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(D,W)=D^2+W^2-32^2=0$$

giving rise to the system:

$$2kDW=\lambda(2D)$$

$$kD^2=\lambda(2W)$$

Thus:

$$\lambda=kW=\frac{kD^2}{2W}\implies D^2=2W^2$$

substituting into the constraint, we obtain:

$$2W^2+W^2-32^2=0$$

$$W=\frac{32}{\sqrt{3}}$$

$$D=\sqrt{2}W=32\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top