Collision between two balls physics problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving collisions between two balls, specifically focusing on elastic and inelastic collisions. The original poster describes a scenario with two identical steel balls and explores the mechanics of their interaction when one is set in motion. The conversation also extends to a related problem involving a cue ball and an 8-ball in a pool game.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for calculating the velocity of the balls using energy conservation principles and momentum equations. There are attempts to relate the height to which the second ball rises based on the first ball's initial height. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of momentum conservation in different collision types, including inelastic collisions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and hints about the conservation of momentum and energy. Some participants express uncertainty about their approaches, while others suggest breaking the problem into smaller parts to facilitate understanding. There is no explicit consensus on the final outcomes, but various lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of conservation laws in different types of collisions, with specific attention to the differences between elastic and inelastic scenarios. There is mention of constraints such as the assumption of frictionless surfaces and the need to consider both x and y components of momentum.

chaotixmonjuish
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Two identical steel balls, each of mass 4.3 kg, are suspended from strings of length 30 cm so that they touch when in their equilibrium position. We pull one of the balls back until its string makes an angle θ = 65° with the vertical and let it go. It collides elastically with the other ball. How high will the other ball rise?

img:http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff106/jtdla/prob01a-1.gif

I have a few ideas as to how to tackle this:

To get the velocity one ball travels couldn't I do this:

mgh+0=1/2mv^2+0 (for the ball on the left)

Then could I put that velocity into a momentum equation.

My second idea was wouldn't the ball that is just sitting there go up to the same height as the other one's initial height. I remember something being demonstrated with so little motor cars when we were talking about collisions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are describing is a simplified Newton's Cradle. Assuming, as in a ideal Newton's Cradle, that all of the first ball's momentum is transferred to the second, I would agree with you that the second ball should rise as high as the first.
 
I got 17.32 cm, right on the first try!

I have a next question that I'm sure I would solve in a similar way:

In a pool game, the cue ball, which has an initial speed of 1.3 m/s, makes an elastic collision with the 8-ball, which is initially at rest. After the collision, the 8-ball moves at an angle θ = 35.1° with respect to the original direction of the cue ball, as shown in the figure. At what angle φ does the cue ball travel after the collision? Assume the pool table is frictionless and the masses of the cue ball and the 8-ball are equal.

I'm sort of sure how to do this at all. It is currently the last problem that has stumped me.
 
chaotixmonjuish said:
I got 17.32 cm, right on the first try!

I have a next question that I'm sure I would solve in a similar way:

In a pool game, the cue ball, which has an initial speed of 1.3 m/s, makes an elastic collision with the 8-ball, which is initially at rest. After the collision, the 8-ball moves at an angle θ = 35.1° with respect to the original direction of the cue ball, as shown in the figure. At what angle φ does the cue ball travel after the collision? Assume the pool table is frictionless and the masses of the cue ball and the 8-ball are equal.

I'm sort of sure how to do this at all. It is currently the last problem that has stumped me.

Good Job! Yes, this problem is also a conservation of momentum problem.

HINT: Remember that if momentum is conserved then the x and y components also have to be conserved. Tell me if you get stuck.
 
I'm still stuck because I don't know how to interpret this in general equation form.
 
well actually

Momentum before= sin(theta)*1.3+sin(35.1)*1.3

would that be about right?
 
That doesn't look good to me.
This is a question in which bodies move in a plane. (You cannot sum up whole motion of the two bodies in one direction.) So, we need two axes, say x and y. Let +ve x-axis be along the direction of the motion of initial cue-ball. And y-axis be in the plane of the table. Conserve momentum along each of the directions: x & y. Note that, initial momentum along x-axis was 1.3*M kg.m/s, where M is the mass of the cue ball; and that along y-axis, it was 0 kg.m/s!
 
X-direction

Momentum before= -M*sin(theta)*1.3+M*sin(35.1)*1.3

Y- direction

0=M*cos(theta)*1.3+M*cos(35.1)*1.3
 
This is in reference to my original question:
Suppose that instead of steel balls we use putty balls. They will collide inelastically and remain stuck together after the collision. How high will the balls rise after the collision?

How would I set this up since KE is not conserved in an inelastic collision.
 
  • #10
chaotixmonjuish said:
This is in reference to my original question:
Suppose that instead of steel balls we use putty balls. They will collide inelastically and remain stuck together after the collision. How high will the balls rise after the collision?

How would I set this up since KE is not conserved in an inelastic collision.

KE is not conserved but what about momentum?
 
  • #11
So momentum is conserved, but I'm not sure how to calculate velocity. Could I still use PE=KE at the bottom to get the velocity?
 
  • #12
chaotixmonjuish said:
Could I still use PE=KE at the bottom to get the velocity?

Yes. Mechanical energy is still conserved in that part of the problem. Then, how do you find the velocity of the big blob of clay after the collision?
 
  • #13
I assume I can just use the conservation of momentum, except the mass will be twice as big at the end.
 
  • #14
I've tried a few methods to no avail, could you give me a better hint?
 
  • #15
chaotixmonjuish said:
I've tried a few methods to no avail, could you give me a better hint?

Can you show me some work? I have no idea why your methods aren't working if you don't show them to me. If you want more detailed help, I'm going to need to see more details.
 
  • #16
So I took the PE=KE of just one ball and got the velocity as 1.8425 m/s.

I setup up a few equations such as:

1/2*4.3*1.8425^2=1/2*8.4*x^2 and then I got 1.30284 as the combined velocity.

I then set up KE=KE+PE with the new velocity and got:

.000067 M
 
  • #17
chaotixmonjuish said:
I setup up a few equations such as:

1/2*4.3*1.8425^2=1/2*8.4*x^2 and then I got 1.30284 as the combined velocity.

It was an inelastic collision, right? How come you are conserving energy for the duration between just before the collision and just after the collision?

Basically, the question can be broken into 3 sub-parts:
1. From the start of motion of the first ball to the moment just before collision. External work done by all other forces (except gravity) is zero, therefore you can use conservation of energy on the first ball.
2. From the moment just before the collision starts to the moment just after the collision ends. Since the collision is inelastic, energy can't be conserved. But, net force on the two-balls system is zero in the direction of speed of the first ball at the moment, momentum can surely be conserved in that direction.
3. From the moment after the collision takes place to (atleast) the moment(s) when each of the balls reach their topmost position. Again, one can apply conservation of energy, since on each of the balls, work done by external force (other than gravity) is zero.

I hope you get the correct result now. Remember, being able to break a big problem into smaller problems is generally fruitful in Physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K