Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Collisions: Elastic vs inelastic

  1. Feb 17, 2014 #1
    So there are a bunch of assignments in physics built on the conservation of momentum law where a bullet of some mass, hits a target of some mass, neglecting friction find the velocity at which the target starts moving. That is all very simple in case of an inelastic collision, all the energy of the bullet is transformed to the target+bullet mass, but what happens when it's a real scenario?

    Assuming we know the mass of the bullet mb and the power behind the rifle - the bullet gains an initial velocity of vinitial. The target is, say, a metal sphere of mass ms at a distance of 200m - How do we calculate the aerial friction that slows down the bullet, assuming there is no wind to considerably change its direction?

    At last the bullet hits the target at a velocity of vfinal. How much energy does the sphere exactly gain?
    The bullet hits the sphere and bounces back,there is likely a dent in the sphere and the bullet is deformed, therefore some of the kinetic energy is transformed into mechanical energy and heat. Since the bullet bounces back I would assume it has something to do with Hooke's law, where the surface of the sphere is acting like a spring. How much energy is consumed by deformation and the spring? Is there a way to know how much of the energy the sphere "gets to use"? To what extent can we use the conservation of momentum in this scenario? What are all the elements we have to consider?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 17, 2014 #2
    The flight of the bullet is studied in external ballistics. What happens when the bullet hits the target is studied in terminal ballistics. Things get hairy fairly quickly as soon as you start looking at the details.
     
  4. Feb 17, 2014 #3
    Assuming bullet's spherical: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes'_law
    Depends on coefficient of restitution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_restitution
    Hooke's law doesn't apply after you reach yield strength:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress–strain_curve
    After which elastic deformation gives way to:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_deformation#Plastic_deformation
    :confused:
    KE should be given by coefficient of restitution, if that's what you mean.
    Momentum should be conserved regardless of the type of collision.
     
  5. Feb 17, 2014 #4

    AlephZero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

  6. Feb 17, 2014 #5
    Forgot about the laminar flow clause... thanks for the correction;
    I seem to be ticking with the IQ of a tick today...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Collisions: Elastic vs inelastic
Loading...