Combinatorics-binomial expansion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pupeye11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the multiplication of generating functions A(x) and B(x), defined as A(x) = ∑_{k=0}^3 a_k x^k and B(x) = ∑_{k=0}^3 b_k x^k. The key conclusion is that A(x)B(x) = ∑_{k=0}^5 (∑_{i=0}^k a_i b_{k-i}) x^k, where the coefficients a_i and b_j correspond to the respective terms in the series. The participants clarify the process of finding coefficients in polynomial expansions, particularly in relation to the binomial theorem and combinatorial coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of generating functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial multiplication
  • Knowledge of binomial coefficients and the binomial theorem
  • Basic combinatorial concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of generating functions in combinatorics
  • Learn about polynomial multiplication techniques in detail
  • Explore Newton's binomial theorem and its applications
  • Practice problems involving coefficients in polynomial expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students in combinatorics, mathematicians working with polynomial functions, and anyone interested in understanding the application of generating functions and binomial expansions in problem-solving.

  • #31
No, because, for example, the x2 term in A(x) and the x3 term in B(x) will combine to contribute to the x5 term in A(x)B(x).

By the way, don't you see a contradiction in the answer you just gave, 126y^4, and the formula you verified earlier, which is a sum of a bunch of terms?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yeah, I forgot about the sum... But if I was working with just B(x) then my answer would be 126y^4 but since I have A(x) I need to multiply together. Is there a theorem in combinatorics that makes this easy or do I just need to do it the long way?
 
  • #33
Well, there's the formula you verified earlier.
 
  • #34
That is kind of the problem, I get that if I use the formula I'll have something that looks like this

\sum_{k>=0}(\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{1}b_{4})x^5. How does this give me a number for a coefficient? Or do I take the coefficient at a_{1} and b_{4} and multiply them together. Then after doing that for all the combinations that create x^5 do I add them all together?
 
  • #35
How did you get this
pupeye11 said:
\sum_{k>=0}(\sum_{i=0}^{k}a_{1}b_{4})x^5
from this
pupeye11 said:
A(X)B(X) = \sum_{k>=0}(\sum_{i=0}a_{i}b_{k-i})x^k

The second sum sign in the answer should be from i=0 to k.
 
  • #36
Yes, that came from the one you just copied and put above.
 
  • #37
I'm asking how you got the first from the second because they're inconsistent.

Expand this summation for k=5:

\sum_{i=0}^k a_i b_{k-i}

What do you get?
 
  • #38
a_{0}b_{5}+a_{1}b_{4}+a_{2}b_{3}+a_{3}b_{2}+a_{4}b_{1}+a_{5}b_{0}
 
  • #39
Right, and that sum of six terms is the coefficient of the x5 term in A(x)B(x). In this case, all the ai's are equal to 1. What are bi's equal to?
 
  • #40
The b_{i}'s are going to be b_{5}=nCr(9,5), b_{4}=nCr(9,4),b_{3}=nCr(9,3),b_{2}=nCr(9,2),b_{1}=nCr(9,1),b_{0}=nCr(9,0)?
 
  • #41
Not quite. Remember, the coefficient of xk includes everything that multiplies xk when you expand (x+y)9.
 
  • #42
Are you trying to say I need the corresponding y's in there too, like b5 would have a y^4 and b4 would have a y^5, so on so forth? Otherwise I am not following you on this one.
 
  • #43
Yes, exactly.
 
  • #44
Alright so the answer will be nCr(9,5)y^4+nCr(9,4)y^5+nCr(9,3)y^6+nCr(9,2)y^7+nCr(9,1)y^8+nCr(9,0)y^9 right? and thank you for all your help!
 
  • #45
Yup, that's it. Good work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K