A Combined diffusion coefficient for gas mixture

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snow_buggy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plasma physics
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating gas mixtures, specifically Fe vapor in Argon, and calculating the mole fractions and diffusion fluxes involved. The participant references two academic papers to support their calculations and understanding of diffusion behavior. They note that Fe vapor diffuses from areas of high concentration to low concentration and from high to low temperature. A point of confusion arises regarding the temperature diffusion coefficient's sign change, raising the question of whether Argon diffuses from low to high temperature. Clarification on this aspect is sought from the referenced literature on transport phenomena.
Snow_buggy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Is the diffusion direction from high concentration to low concentration and from high temperature to low temperature?
Hi. I am starting to do a gas mixture simulation. I learn the fundamentals from a paper. (doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/2/022001)
For a gas mixture (Fe vapor in Argon), the mole fraction of Fe vapor is calculated by,
1698340196300.png
and the diffusion flux JFe is given by,
1698340272926.png

x_ar is the mole fraction of Argon; T is the temperature; P is the pressure; E is the electric field.
It seems like Fe vapor diffuses from high concentration of Fe vapor to low concentration (grad x_Ar) and from high temperature to low temperature (- grad T).

If we calculates the mole fraction of Argon not Fe vapor, this paper (doi: 10.1007/BF01459700) says these coefficients follow this rule,
1698340760935.png

I don't understand why the temperature diffusion coefficient change the sign? Does it mean the argon diffuses from low temperature to high temperature?
 
Science news on Phys.org
See Transport Phenomena by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K