Combining Laplace Transforms to Obtain Time Domain Behavior

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on combining Laplace transforms to derive time domain behavior from a specific transfer function. The key transformation involves manipulating the expression \(\frac{s}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2}\) by recognizing the "exponential shift" rule. This leads to separating the terms and applying inverse Laplace transforms to achieve the final result. The outcome is expressed as \(e^{\alpha t}*(\cos(bt) + \frac{\alpha}{b}\sin(bt))\). This process highlights the importance of understanding algebraic manipulation in Laplace transforms for electrical engineering applications.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Not a homework problem exactly, but in an EE textbook I saw something to the following effect:

To obtain the time domain behavior for \frac{s}{s^2+\frac{\omega_0}{Q} + {\omega_0}^2} the following Laplace transforms are combined to cancel the term in the numerator:

\frac{1}{(s-\alpha)^2+b^2} = \frac{1}{b}e^{\alpha t}sin(bt)

and

\frac{s+\alpha}{(s-a)^2 + b^2} = e^{\alpha t}cos(bt)

I may just be tired, but I'm having a lot of trouble seeing how those two Laplace transforms were algebraically combined to get "s" alone in the numerator. Any hint would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{s}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2}=\frac{s+\alpha-\alpha}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2} :wink:
 
Aha! I see it now. Need to remember my "exponential shift" rule.

So we get \frac{s+\alpha-\alpha}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2} = \frac{s-\alpha}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2} + \frac{\alpha}{(s-\alpha)^2 + b^2} = e^{\alpha t}L^{-1}(\frac{s}{s^2+b^2} + \alpha\frac{1}{s^2+b^2})

which I believe is the Laplace transform of

e^{\alpha t}*(cos(bt) + \frac{\alpha}{b}sin(bt))

Thanks!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K