Comet Elliptical Orbits Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Orbits
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 8K views
Chaso
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Comets move around the sun in very elliptical orbits. At its closet approach, in 1986, Comet Halley was 8.79 x 10^7 km from the sun and moving with a speed of 54.6 km/s.

What was the comet's speed when it crossed Neptune's orbit in 2006?

Homework Equations



Mv1r1=Mv2r2

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was use the equation above, and solve for v2. But it says I'm wrong. Any Suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For r2, I use the radius from Neptune to the sun.
 
Oh I see ... excuse me, didn;t read it properly.
That formula should be:

##\vec{r}_1\times m\vec{v}_1=\vec{r}_2\times m\vec{v}_2##

At Neptune's orbit, the velocity won't be tangential to the radius.
 
Chaso said:

Homework Statement


Comets move around the sun in very elliptical orbits. At its closet approach, in 1986, Comet Halley was 8.79 x 10^7 km from the sun and moving with a speed of 54.6 km/s.

What was the comet's speed when it crossed Neptune's orbit in 2006?

Homework Equations



Mv1r1=Mv2r2

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was use the equation above, and solve for v2. But it says I'm wrong. Any Suggestions?

The formula you've chosen would apply when the velocities are both perpendicular to the radii, say at perihelion and at aphelion. Here this holds true for only one of the given points (the closest approach).

Instead, consider a conservation of energy approach.
 
gneill said:
The formula you've chosen would apply when the velocities are both perpendicular to the radii, say at perihelion and at aphelion. Here this holds true for only one of the given points (the closest approach).

Instead, consider a conservation of energy approach.
So use K2 + U2 = K1 + U1

expansion to:
(1/2)(Mc)(v2^2) + -(G)(Me)(Mc)/(R) = (1/2)(Mc)(v1^2) + -(G)(Me)(Mc)/(R2)

R = Distance of neptune from sun
R2 = 8.79 x 10^7

Is this what I do?
 
Last edited: