MHB Common roots and finding real values

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the real value of \(a\) for the quadratic equations \(ax^2+2x+1=0\) and \(x^2+2x+a=0\) that share common roots. By applying Vieta's formulas, the sum of the roots from both equations leads to the equation \(-\frac{2}{a}=-2\). Solving this results in \(a=1\). The response notes that a more detailed explanation of the derivation would have been beneficial. The conclusion confirms that the correct value of \(a\) is indeed 1.
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
srirahulan's question titled "Algeb" from Math Help Forum,

If \(ax^2+2x+1=0\mbox{ and }x^2+2x+a=0\) have the common roots, find the real value of a.

Hi srirahulan,

Let \(\alpha\mbox{ and }\beta\) be the two roots of these quadratic equations. Then, according to the first equation,

\[\alpha+\beta=-\frac{2}{a}~~~~~~(1)\]

Considering the second equation,

\[\alpha+\beta=-2~~~~~~~(2)\]

By (1) and (2);

\[-\frac{2}{a}=-2\]

\[\therefore a=1\]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top