Commutator of exponential operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the commutator [a,e^{-iHt}] given that [H,a]=-Ea. The initial attempt using Taylor expansion yields an incorrect first-order result of -iEta, leading to confusion. The expected outcome is e^{-iEt}, which aligns with the calculation e^{iHt}ae^{-iHt}=e^{-iEt}a. It is noted that while the first order does not suffice, the second-order expansion successfully produces the necessary terms to reconstruct the exponential form. The realization is that higher-order terms are essential for accurate results in this context.
gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
How do I compute the commutator [a,e^{-iHt}], knowing that [H,a]=-Ea?

I tried by Taylor expanding the exponential, but I get -iEta to first order, which seems wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why does it seem wrong?
 
The answer I was expecting to get is something like e^{-iEt}. This follows from the fact that I was trying to replicate the following calculation

e^{iHt}ae^{-iHt}=e^{-iEt}a

which is said to be justified by [H,a]=-Ea.

If I take my result to be true, I get

e^{iHt}ae^{-iHt}=e^{iHt}(e^{-iHt}a-iEta)=a-ie^{iHt}Eta
 
The first order is not the final result...
 
Second order does the job...thanks.
 
gentsagree said:
Second order does the job...thanks.
I am surprised by that, as the final result has all orders, and just ignoring orders means changing the value of things.
 
It does the job in the sense that with two orders I can get back two terms which I can combine back together to form an exponential by recognising they are the first two terms in its Taylor expansion. I thought, naively, that one order would have been enough, but the fact that the first commutator vanishes doesn't make it work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
713
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K