Commutator of square angular momentum operator and position operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutation relations involving the square angular momentum operator \(\vec{L}^{2}\) and the position operator \(\vec{r}\). Participants are tasked with demonstrating a specific commutation relation and exploring the implications of established results in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the established result of the commutator \([\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}]\) and express uncertainty about how to proceed from there. Some suggest using vector component notation or matrix notation to simplify the problem. Others question how to relate specific components of the angular momentum to the overall commutation relation.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of various approaches to the problem, with some participants offering insights into vector notation and the use of the triple product expansion. However, there is no explicit consensus on the next steps, and some participants express confusion about the progression of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem and the potential need for additional background in vector notation or commutation relations. There is an acknowledgment of the linearity of the commutator and its product rule, which may influence the direction of the discussion.

elmp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
can someone please help me with this. it's killing me.

Homework Statement


to show [tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2}\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]\right]=2\hbar^{2}(\vec{r}\vec{L}^{2}+\vec{L}^{2}\vec{r})[/tex]

Homework Equations


I have already established a result (from the hint of the question) that
[tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]=2\imath\hbar\vec{r}\times\vec{L}+2\hbar^{2}\vec{r}[/tex]

but where to go from that?

The Attempt at a Solution


basically I will need to show either one of (4.55) from http://www.eng.fsu.edu/~dommelen/quantum/style_a/commute.html, but I am running out of clues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you know vector component notation (look it up) then this is a pretty simple problem

[tex]\vec{r} \times \vec{L} = \epsilon_{ijk} r_j L_k[/tex] where [tex]\epsilon_{ijk}[/tex] is the levi-civita tensor (look it up)

if you don't you could use the triple product expansion

[tex]\vec{r} \times (\vec {r} \times \vec{p}) = \vec{r} (\vec{r} \cdot \vec{p}) - \vec{p}( r^2)[/tex]

and then apply all the other commutation relations you know, but that is tedious
 
Hm, I'm interested in this now as well, but in the OP's post I don't see how quite to arrive at:

elmp said:

Homework Equations


I have already established a result (from the hint of the question) that
[tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]=2\imath\hbar\vec{r}\times\vec{L}+2\hbar^{2}\vec{r}[/tex]

I can find that
[L^2,z]=2i\hbar(xL_y-yL_x-i\hbar z)

and the equivalents for x and y, but how do you relate that to the commutator

[tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right][/tex]

?
 
Nevermind my last post, if you do everything in vector notation (or matrix notation, things work out peachy keen.
 
sgd37 said:
if you know vector component notation (look it up) then this is a pretty simple problem

[tex]\vec{r} \times \vec{L} = \epsilon_{ijk} r_j L_k[/tex] where [tex]\epsilon_{ijk}[/tex] is the levi-civita tensor (look it up)

if you don't you could use the triple product expansion

[tex]\vec{r} \times (\vec {r} \times \vec{p}) = \vec{r} (\vec{r} \cdot \vec{p}) - \vec{p}( r^2)[/tex]

and then apply all the other commutation relations you know, but that is tedious

hmmm, i must be really stupid, but i still don't see how to proceed
 
elmp said:
can someone please help me with this. it's killing me.

Homework Statement


to show [tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2}\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]\right]=2\hbar^{2}(\vec{r}\vec{L}^{2}+\vec{L}^{2}\vec{r})[/tex]


Homework Equations


I have already established a result (from the hint of the question) that
[tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]=2\imath\hbar\vec{r}\times\vec{L}+2\hbar^{2}\vec{r}[/tex]

but where to go from that?

Use that fact that the commutator is linear and its product rule, so you get
[tex]\left[\vec{L}^{2}, \left[\vec{L}^{2},\vec{r}\right]\right] = \left[\vec{L}^{2}, 2\mathrm{i}\hbar\vec{r}\times\vec{L}+2\hbar^{2}\vec{r} \right] = 2\mathrm{i}\hbar \left[\vec{L}^{2}, \vec{r}\times\vec{L} \right] + 2\hbar^{2} \left[\vec{L}^{2}, \vec{r} \right] = 2\mathrm{i}\hbar \vec{r}\times \left[\vec{L}^{2}, \vec{L} \right] + 2\mathrm{i}\hbar \left[\vec{L}^{2}, \vec{r} \right] \times\vec{L} + 2\hbar^{2} \left[\vec{L}^{2}, \vec{r} \right][/tex]

Then you are almost done, to have a nice result you need the triple product expansion given before.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K