Commutator, operators momentum and position

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 7K views
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


I must calculate [X,P].

Homework Equations


Not sure. What I've researched through the Internet suggests that [tex][\hat A, \hat B]=\hat A \hat B - \hat B \hat A[/tex] and that [tex][\hat A, \hat B]=-[\hat B, \hat A][/tex].
Furthermore if the operators commute, then [tex][\hat A, \hat B]=0[/tex] obviously from the anterior property.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I've checked out in wikipedia the definition of position and momentum operators and they seems to involve the wave function [tex]\Psi[/tex]?

If I consider [tex]\hat X =x[/tex] and [tex]\hat P =-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex], I get that [tex]\hat X\hat P =-i \hbar[/tex] but for [tex]\hat P \hat X[/tex] I have a doubt.
I get that it's worth [tex]x \left ( - \frac{i \hbar \partial}{\partial x} \right )[/tex]. I'm guessing it's worth [tex]-i\hbar[/tex]? So that if follows that [tex][\hat X,\hat P]=0[/tex] and hence the position and linear momentum commute. I'm not sure I'm right on this, nor do I have any idea about some of the implications the commutativity implies.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To avoid confusion, compute this commutator acting on an arbitrary wavefunction:

[tex][\hat{X},\hat{P}]\Psi.[/tex]

As a differential operator, [tex]\hat{P}[/tex] acts on everything to the right, so the term

[tex]\hat{P}\hat{X} \Psi = \hat{P}(\hat{X} \Psi),[/tex]

so you need to use the product rule.
 
fzero said:
To avoid confusion, compute this commutator acting on an arbitrary wavefunction:

[tex][\hat{X},\hat{P}]\Psi.[/tex]

As a differential operator, [tex]\hat{P}[/tex] acts on everything to the right, so the term

[tex]\hat{P}\hat{X} \Psi = \hat{P}(\hat{X} \Psi),[/tex]

so you need to use the product rule.

Thank you so much. I'm so glad I've asked on this forum, I would have done meaningless work without you.
I reach, after some basic alegebra: [tex][\hat X, \hat P] \Psi =i \hbar \Psi[/tex]. So the 2 operators do not commute.
Am I right?
 
fluidistic said:
Thank you so much. I'm so glad I've asked on this forum, I would have done meaningless work without you.
I reach, after some basic alegebra: [tex][\hat X, \hat P] \Psi =i \hbar \Psi[/tex]. So the 2 operators do not commute.
Am I right?

Correct. Also, since the function [tex]\Psi[/tex] is arbitrary, you can turn this into an operator statement:

[tex][\hat X, \hat P] =i \hbar \hat{I},[/tex]

where [tex]\hat{I}[/tex] is the identity operator.
 
fzero said:
Correct. Also, since the function [tex]\Psi[/tex] is arbitrary, you can turn this into an operator statement:

[tex][\hat X, \hat P] =i \hbar \hat{I},[/tex]

where [tex]\hat{I}[/tex] is the identity operator.

Nice. Problem solved.