Commutators of angular momentum, linear momentum squared and H

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving commutation relations involving the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and the angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}##. Specifically, participants are tasked with showing that ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]=0## and subsequently that ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{H}]=0## under certain potential conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the algebraic manipulation of the commutation relations and the implications of symmetry in the components of angular momentum. There is an exploration of the terms generated during the calculation and whether certain derivatives can be simplified or are indeed zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion regarding the algebraic steps taken, particularly in relation to the derivatives involved. Others provide insights suggesting that certain terms may be dropped, indicating a potential path forward. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific methods or approaches to the problem. The discussion includes questioning the definitions and assumptions related to partial derivatives.

Mark_L
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}} ##, prove that ##\begin{eqnarray}
[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]&=&0\end{eqnarray}##:

[Hint: Write ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}## as the ##x##-component of the angular momentum operator and evaluate ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi##.
The results for the other components will follow by symmetry.]

Hence show that if the potential is given by ##V(|\mathbf{x}|)##, then ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{H}] = 0##:

Homework Equations



##\begin{eqnarray}\hat{\mathbf{P}}&=&-i\hbar\nabla\\
\hat{L}_x&=&y\hat{p}_{z}-z\hat{p}_{y}\\
\hat{H}&=&-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V\\
\end{eqnarray}##

The Attempt at a Solution



After some algebra just using ##[A,B]=AB-BA## and substituting the equations above,

##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3y\frac{\partial d}{\partial z}(\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})-i\hbar^3z\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})+i\hbar^3\nabla^2(z\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})-i\hbar^3\nabla^2(y\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})##

and doing all the derivatives eventually gave ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial y}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial z}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial y}{\partial z}]##

But this isn't zero so I'm definitely stuck! I checked all my working and it's definitely all correct so I'm thinking there is a different (hopefully less algebraically intensive) method.

Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark_L said:

Homework Statement



For the linear momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{p}}## and angular momentum operator ##\hat{\mathbf{L}} ##, prove that ##\begin{eqnarray}
[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]&=&0\end{eqnarray}##:

[Hint: Write ##\hat{\mathbf{L}}## as the ##x##-component of the angular momentum operator and evaluate ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi##.
The results for the other components will follow by symmetry.]

Hence show that if the potential is given by ##V(|\mathbf{x}|)##, then ##[\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{H}] = 0##:

Homework Equations



##\begin{eqnarray}\hat{\mathbf{P}}&=&-i\hbar\nabla\\
\hat{L}_x&=&y\hat{p}_{z}-z\hat{p}_{y}\\
\hat{H}&=&-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2+V\\
\end{eqnarray}##

The Attempt at a Solution



After some algebra just using ##[A,B]=AB-BA## and substituting the equations above,

##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3y\frac{\partial d}{\partial z}(\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})-i\hbar^3z\nabla^2(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})+i\hbar^3\nabla^2(z\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y})-i\hbar^3\nabla^2(y\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z})##

and doing all the derivatives eventually gave ##[\hat{L}_{x},\hat{\mathbf{p}}^2]\psi=i\hbar^3[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial y}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial y}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial y^2}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial x\partial z}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}-2\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial z^2}\frac{\partial y}{\partial z}]##

But this isn't zero so I'm definitely stuck! I checked all my working and it's definitely all correct so I'm thinking there is a different (hopefully less algebraically intensive) method.

Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.

Yes, it is zero. Things like ##\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}## are zero. Same for all of your second derivatives of coordinates. Only things like ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}## aren't zero and that's equal to 1. Aren't they? I think you've been carrying around a lot of terms you could have dropped.
 
Dick said:
Yes, it is zero. Things like ##\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}## are zero. Same for all of your second derivatives of coordinates. Only things like ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}## aren't zero and that's equal to 1. Aren't they? I think you've been carrying around a lot of terms you could have dropped.

Why are they zero?
 
Mark_L said:
Why are they zero?

Because it's the partial derivative of y taken with respect to x. In taking a partial derivative with respect to x you hold y and z fixed. So it's the derivative of a constant. I'd look back at the definition of partial derivative.
 
Okay, so what about the next part?

We have ##\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m}\hat{\mathbf{P^2}}+V##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K