Comoving distance in cosmology

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Apashanka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of proper distance in cosmology, specifically addressing why the proper time between two galaxies, denoted as dΓ, is taken to be zero. The equation dΓ² = dt² - a(t)²dr² is analyzed, leading to the conclusion that dΓ=0 simplifies the integration of comoving distance as ∫dr = ∫dt/a(t). This approach is crucial for deriving cosmological redshift by relating the comoving distance traveled by signals to the scale factor history.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological principles and metrics
  • Familiarity with the scale factor a(t) in cosmology
  • Knowledge of differential equations in the context of physics
  • Basic concepts of redshift and its implications in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of cosmological redshift using comoving distance
  • Explore the role of the scale factor a(t) in expanding universe models
  • Learn about the implications of proper distance in cosmological observations
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of differential geometry in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the mathematical foundations of cosmological distance measurements and redshift analysis.

Apashanka
Messages
427
Reaction score
15
For calculating the proper distance in cosmology why is the proper time between two points (galaxy) dΓ is taken 0??
e.g dΓ2=dt2-a(t)2dr2
Taking dΓ=0 and ∫dr=∫dt/a(t)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Apashanka said:
For calculating the proper distance in cosmology why is the proper time between two points (galaxy) dΓ is taken 0??
e.g dΓ2=dt2-a(t)2dr2
Taking dΓ=0 and ∫dr=∫dt/a(t)
It is not. What you have there is an expression for the comoving distance.

In the particular case you are referring to, it is part of a derivation of cosmological redshift based on expressing the comoving distance traveled by two consecutive signals in terms of the scale factor history and using that to find the time difference at emission to be compared to the time difference at reception.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K