Comoving Distance in LCDM - Understanding an Approximation

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
Homework Statement
Finding the Comoving Distance for LCDM universe.
Relevant Equations
$$\chi(t) = \int_{t_e}^{t_0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}$$
I am trying to find the comoving distance,

$$\chi = c\int_0^z \frac{dz}{H(z)}$$ for the ##\Lambda##CDM model (spatially flat universe, containing only matter and ##\Lambda##).

$$H^2 = H_0^2[\Omega_{m,0}(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{\Lambda, 0}]$$

When I put this into integral I am getting,

$$\chi = \frac{c}{H_0}\int_0^z \frac{dz}{\sqrt{\Omega_{m,0}(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{\Lambda, 0}}}$$

which seems that I cannot take the integral manually (only numeric integration is possible).

So I have decided to approximate the solution, as its done in many textbooks (including Weinberg and Barbara).

So I have written $$\chi(t) = \int_{t_e}^{t_0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}$$ and then I have expanded the ##a(t)## around ##t_0##.

$$a(t) \simeq 1 + H_0(t-t_0) - \frac{q_0H_0^2}{2}(t-t_0)^2 + \frac{j_0H_0^3}{6}(t-t_0)^3$$

from here I need to find $$a(t)^{-1}$$ so that I can put that inside the integral.
I have seen that $$1/x \simeq \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n(x-1)^n$$.

So by similar logic I should get

$$a(t)^{-1} \simeq 1 - H_0(t-t_0) + \frac{q_0H_0^2}{2}(t-t_0)^2 - \frac{j_0H_0^3}{6}(t-t_0)^3$$

However, it seems its not the case. In Barbara (the calculations do not include ##j_0##) its written as,

$$a(t)^{-1} \simeq 1 - H_0(t-t_0) + (1+q_0/2)\frac{H_0^2}{2}(t-t_0)^2$$

I just don't understand how this can be possible...I am doing a mistake somewhere but I don't know where.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a(t)^{-1}=\frac{1}{1+A}=1-A+A^2+..
where
A=H_0(t-t_0)-qH_0^2/2(t-t_0)^2+..
First order comes from A only . Second order comes from A and ##A^2## which is ##H_0^2(t-t_0)^2##. Similarly third order comes from A, A^2 and A^3.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top