Help Understanding Response Function $$H(\omega)$$

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the response function $$H(\omega)$$, defined as $$=\sum_{j} χ_{HAj}h_j(\omega)$$, with $$χ_{HA}$$ derived from the commutation relation between the Hamiltonian $$H(t)$$ and operator $$A(0)$$. The user correctly identifies that $$χ_{HA}$$ simplifies to $$-h_0cos(\omega t)χ_{AA}$$, leading to the final expression $$=\sum_{j}-h_0^{2}cos^2(\omega t)χ_{AAj}$$. The user initially sought confirmation of their reasoning but later resolved their query independently.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Familiarity with commutation relations in quantum theory
  • Knowledge of trace operations in linear algebra
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation involving summations and trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the response function in quantum statistical mechanics
  • Explore the role of the trace operation in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the physical significance of the commutation relations in quantum systems
  • Investigate the applications of response functions in condensed matter physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and condensed matter physics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of response functions and their mathematical foundations.

Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Let us study a system coupled tho an external field h(t) with the Hamiltonian $$H = H_0 −h(t)A $$
Assume that the perturbation is monochromatic, $$h(t) = h_0 cos \omega t$$, and take the unperturbed density operator to be thermal. With the aid of a suitable average over the period of the perturbation, show that the rate of change of the expectation value of the perturbed Hamiltonian $$H_0$$ equals $$\frac{1}{2}h_{0}^2\omegaχ_{AA}(\omega)$$.
Relevant Equations
$$χ_{AA}=\frac{1}{2\hbar} Tr{\overline{\rho}[\overline{A(t)},\overline{A(0)}]}$$
$$<B(\omega)>=\sum_{j} χ_{BAj}h_j(\omega)$$ where $$B(\omega)$$ is an operator.
$$<H(\omega)>=\sum_{j} χ_{HAj}h_j(\omega)$$
Where $$χ_{HA}=\frac{1}{2\hbar} Tr{{\rho}[{H(t)},{A(0)}]}$$.
But
$$[H(t),A(0)]=[H_o,A(0)]-[A(t)h,A(0)]=-h_0 cos(\omega t)[A(t),A(0)]$$.
So $$χ_{HA}=-\frac{1}{2\hbar}Tr(\rho h_0 cos(\omega t)[A(t),A(0)])=-h_0cos(\omega t)χ_{AA}$$.
Then $$<H(\omega)>=\sum_{j}-h_0^{2}cos^2(\omega t)χ_{AAj}$$.

Is my reasoning correct thus far? And where would I go from here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, figured it out. Thank you though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K