Compactness of sets in Banach spaces

  • Thread starter Thread starter TaPaKaH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Banach Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in functional analysis, specifically concerning the compactness of sets in Banach spaces. The original poster presents a scenario involving a sequence of compact sets and conditions on their arrangement and radii, seeking to prove that the closure of their union is compact.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of compactness in normed spaces, particularly focusing on sequential compactness. They discuss the existence of convergent subsequences from sequences derived from the closure of the union of compact sets.

Discussion Status

Some participants have proposed splitting the problem into cases based on the distribution of terms in the sets. There is ongoing exploration of how to establish convergence in different scenarios, with some guidance offered on estimating distances between elements in the sequences. However, no consensus has been reached on the complete solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working in infinite-dimensional spaces and question the implications of compactness in this context. There are references to specific estimates involving the radii and diameters of the sets, indicating a need for careful consideration of these factors in the proof.

TaPaKaH
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Working in a banach space [itex](X,\|\cdot\|)[/itex] we have a sequence of compact sets [itex]A_k\subset X[/itex].
Assume that there exist [itex]r_k>0[/itex] such that [itex]\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}r_k<\infty[/itex] and for every [itex]k\in\mathbb{N}[/itex]: $$A_{k+1}\subset\{x+u|x\in A_k,u\in X,\|u\|\leq r_k\}.$$Prove that the closure of [itex]\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}A_k[/itex] is compact.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


While talking to the teaching assistant it all seemed very doable, but now that I am back home, I am still struggling.
Here is what I was suggested to do:

Since we are in a normed space, then compactness is equivalent to sequential compactness, i.e. existence of a convergent subsequence for every sequence.
Let [itex]\{x_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[/itex] be a sequence from the closure of [itex]\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}A_k[/itex]. Then for each n there exists [itex]y_n[/itex] from [itex]\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}A_k[/itex] such that [itex]\|x_n-y_n\|<\frac{1}{n}[/itex] and it sufficent to show that [itex]\{y_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[/itex] has a convergent subsequence.

This is the point where I lose my grip and have no idea what to do further
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Split up the situation in two parts:

  • Case I: Infinitely many terms of [itex](y_n)_n[/itex] are contained in a set [itex]A_k[/itex].
  • Case II: There are only finitely many terms of [itex](y_n)_n[/itex] in each [itex]A_k[/itex].

What is the convergent subsequence in each of those cases?
 
In Case 1 existence of convergent subsequence follows immediately from compactness of [itex]A_k[/itex].

In Case 2 I do not yet have a complete solution.
I decided to define [itex]\{B_n\}[/itex] disjoint such that [itex]\bigcup_k B_k=\bigcup_k A_k[/itex] and subsequence [itex]\{z_m\}_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\subset\{y_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/itex] such that for any two elements [itex]z_i\in B_{k_i}[/itex] and [itex]z_j\in B_{k_j}[/itex], [itex]j>i[/itex] leads to [itex]k_j>k_i[/itex] and vice versa.
Now trying to show that [itex]\{z_m\}[/itex] has a Cauchy and therefore convergent subsequence as [itex]\{B_n\}[/itex]s shrink in size, but I feel this might not be the case for infinite-dimensional spaces unless compactness of [itex]\{A_n\}[/itex]s in an infinite-dimensional space means that the object itself is finite-dimensional (does it?)
 
Ok, your proposal for the convergent sequence is a good one. Now, can you find an estimate for

[tex]\|z_i-z_j\|[/tex]

Try to find an estimate that uses the [itex]r_k[/itex]?? Use that

[tex]A_{k+1}\subseteq \{x+u~\vert~x\in A_k,~u\in X,~\|u\|<r_k\}[/tex]
 
I define [itex]\{B_k\}[/itex] in the following way: $$B_1:=A_1, B_k:=A_k\setminus B_{k-1}.$$ so that [itex]B_{k+1}[/itex] is in [itex]r_k[/itex] surrounding of [itex]B_k[/itex].

Estimating [itex]\|z_i-z_{i+1}\|[/itex] from above I get [itex]r_i +[/itex] diam[itex](B_i)[/itex] which need not go to 0 as [itex]i\to\infty[/itex] and that's the problem.
 
TaPaKaH said:
I define [itex]\{B_k\}[/itex] in the following way: $$B_1:=A_1, B_k:=A_k\setminus B_{k-1}.$$ so that [itex]B_{k+1}[/itex] is in [itex]r_k[/itex] surrounding of [itex]B_k[/itex].

Estimating [itex]\|z_i-z_{i+1}\|[/itex] from above I get [itex]r_i +[/itex] diam[itex](B_i)[/itex] which need not go to 0 as [itex]i\to\infty[/itex] and that's the problem.

Well, what you did now is written [itex]z_{i+1}=x+u[/itex] with [itex]x\in A_k[/itex]. Can you write other [itex]z_j[/itex] also as [itex]x+u[/itex] with [itex]x\in A_k[/itex] and [itex]\|u\|\leq \sum_k r_k[/itex]?? That way you have transformed the sequence [itex](z_j)[/itex] into a sequence in the compact set [itex]A_k[/itex] and some other terms u.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K