Compactness Theorem: Intersection of Compact Sets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Compactness Theorem as presented in Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis." Participants explore the implications of the theorem, which states that if a collection of compact subsets of a metric space has the finite intersection property, then their overall intersection is nonempty. The focus includes understanding the proof and clarifying notations used in the theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the theorem's implications, questioning whether the nonemptiness of finite intersections guarantees the nonemptiness of the overall intersection.
  • A participant presents a proof that generalizes the theorem to compact subsets in a Hausdorff space, emphasizing the finite intersection property and the closed nature of compact sets.
  • Another participant shares Rudin's proof, detailing the contradiction that arises if the overall intersection is assumed to be empty, thus reinforcing the theorem's validity.
  • There is a request for clarification on notations used in the proof, particularly regarding the complement of compact sets and its role in forming an open cover.
  • Participants confirm that the notation $G_{\alpha}=K_{\alpha}^c$ refers to the complement of each compact set, which is indeed used as an open cover due to the closed nature of compact sets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the theorem and the proofs presented, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the notations and specific steps in the proofs. The discussion includes clarifications and confirmations rather than a consensus on a singular understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express difficulty with the notations and the implications of the theorem, indicating a need for further clarification on specific mathematical concepts and their applications within the proof.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
In the Principles of Mathematical analysis by Rudin we have the following theorem

If $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space $$X$$ such that the intersection of every finite sub collection of $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is nonempty , then $$\cap\, \mathbb{K}_{\alpha} $$ is nonempty .

If I understand correctly then this theorem states that if any finite intersection is nonempty then any arbitrarily intersection is also nonempty , right ?. I was trying to understand the proof but it wasn't so clear for me :confused:.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZaidAlyafey said:
In the Principles of Mathematical analysis by Rudin we have the following theorem

If $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space $$X$$ such that the intersection of every finite sub collection of $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is nonempty , then $$\cap\, \mathbb{K}_{\alpha} $$ is nonempty .

If I understand correctly then this theorem states that if any finite intersection is nonempty then any arbitrarily intersection is also nonempty , right ?. I was trying to understand the proof but it wasn't so clear for me :confused:.
Hello Zaid.

Can you point out where in the book is this theorem given?
 
I worked out a proof which I think is easy to understand.

We prove a more general result which is:

Let $\mathcal K=\{K_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in J}$ be a family of compact subsets of a Hausdorff space $C$ having the finite intersection property, that is, intersection of any finite subfamily of $\mathcal K$ is non-empty, then $\bigcap_{\alpha\in J} K_\alpha\neq \emptyset$.

Fix $\alpha_0\in J$ and define $C_\beta=K_{\alpha_0}\cap K_\beta$ for all $\beta\in J$. Its easy to show that each $C_\beta$ is a closed subset of $K_{\alpha_0}$ by noting that each $K_\alpha$ is a closed subset of $X$ since compact subsets of Hausdorff spaces are closed. Now clearly $\{C_\beta\}_{\beta\in J}$ has finite intersection property as subspaces of $K_{\alpha_0}$. Since $K_{\alpha_0}$ is compact and each $C_\beta$ is closed in $K_{\alpha_0}$ we know that $\bigcap_{\beta\in J}C_\beta\neq\emptyset$. This leads to the required result.
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
If $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space $$X$$ such that the intersection of every finite sub collection of $$\mathbb{K}_{\alpha}$$ is nonempty , then $$\cap\, \mathbb{K}_{\alpha} $$ is nonempty.

I don't know which are your doubts. Here is the Rudin's proof (I've added some details):

Consider an element $K_1$ of $\{K_{\alpha}\}$. Suppose $\bigcap K_{\alpha}=\emptyset$ and denote $G_{\alpha}=K_{\alpha}^c$. Then, there in no point in $K_1$ belonging to all $K_{\alpha}$, so $\{G_{\alpha}\}$ is an open cover of $K_1$ (on a metric space every compact set is closed). As $K_1$ is compact there is a finite subcover $\{G_{\alpha_1},\ldots,G_{\alpha_n}\}$ of $\{G_{\alpha}\}$ such that $K_1\subset G_{\alpha_1}\cup\ldots\cup G_{\alpha_n}$. But this implies:
$$K_{1}\cap K_{\alpha_1}\cap\ldots\cap K_{\alpha_n}=\emptyset$$
(contradiction with the hypothesis).
 
Fernando Revilla said:
I don't know which are your doubts. Here is the Rudin's proof (I've added some details):

Consider an element $K_1$ of $\{K_{\alpha}\}$. Suppose $\bigcap K_{\alpha}=\emptyset$ and denote $G_{\alpha}=K_{\alpha}^c$. Then, there in no point in $K_1$ belonging to all $K_{\alpha}$, so $\{G_{\alpha}\}$ is an open cover of $K_1$ (on a metric space every compact set is closed). As $K_1$ is compact there is a finite subcover $\{G_{\alpha_1},\ldots,G_{\alpha_n}\}$ of $\{G_{\alpha}\}$ such that $K_1\subset G_{\alpha_1}\cup\ldots\cup G_{\alpha_n}$. But this implies:
$$K_{1}\cap K_{\alpha_1}\cap\ldots\cap K_{\alpha_n}=\emptyset$$
(contradiction with the hypothesis).

I know that the proof is easy but I might find difficulties in the notations , first what does
$G_{\alpha}=K_{\alpha}^c$ , is this the complement of each compact set ? so since compact sets are closed the complement works as an open cover ?
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
I know that the proof is easy but I might find difficulties in the notations , first what does
$G_{\alpha}=K_{\alpha}^c$ , is this the complement of each compact set ? so since compact sets are closed the complement works as an open cover ?

Right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K