Action variables for the Kepler problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the action variables for the Kepler problem using the Hamiltonian formulation. The Hamiltonian is defined as $$H = \frac{1}{2m} p_r^2 + \frac{1}{2mr^2} p_{\phi}^2 - \frac{k}{r}$$, where the generalized momenta are $$p_r = m\dot{r}$$ and $$p_{\phi} = mr^2 \dot{\phi}$$. The action variable for $$\phi$$ is straightforwardly integrated to yield $$I_{\phi} = p_{\phi}$$, while the action variable $$I_r$$ requires a more complex integral, ultimately leading to the result $$I_r = k\sqrt{\frac{m}{2|E|}} - I_{\phi}$$. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the integral's limits and the relationship between the roots $$r_{\text{min}}$$ and $$r_{\text{max}}$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with action variables in classical mechanics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the Kepler problem and orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications in classical mechanics
  • Learn advanced integration techniques for solving complex integrals
  • Research the properties of action variables in dynamical systems
  • Explore the implications of the Kepler problem in celestial mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying classical mechanics, particularly those interested in Hamiltonian dynamics and orbital mechanics.

etotheipi
Homework Statement
Express the Hamiltonian of the orbit in terms of the action variables ##I_{\phi}## and ##I_r## and hence show that the orbit is closed
Relevant Equations
N/A
Let's consider the Hamiltonian $$H = \frac{1}{2m} p_r^2 + \frac{1}{2mr^2} p_{\phi}^2 - \frac{k}{r}$$where the generalised momenta are here ##p_r = m\dot{r}## and ##p_{\phi} = mr^2 \dot{\phi}## conjugate to the coordinates ##r## and ##\phi##. Since ##p_{\phi}## does not depend on ##\phi## it can easily be integrated to obtain the action variable ##I_{\phi} = p_{\phi}## (which is also by construction a constant of motion), however the action variable corresponding to ##r## proves more difficult. Since ##\partial H / \partial t = 0##, we have ##H \equiv E = \text{constant}## because ##dH/dt = -\dot{p}_i \dot{q}_i + \dot{p}_i \dot{q}_i + \partial H / \partial t = 0##. The integral for ##I_r## becomes$$I_r = \frac{1}{2\pi} \oint p_r dr = 2\times \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \sqrt{2mE + \frac{2mk}{r} - \frac{I_{\phi}^2}{r^2}} dr$$We must show this equals$$I_r = k\sqrt{\frac{m}{2|E|}} - I_{\phi}$$Two problems, I can't see how to do that integral, and we'd also need to somehow eliminate ##r_{\text{min}}## and ##r_{\text{max}}##. Anyway, the integral is probably more important right now... let ##A \equiv 2mE##, ##B \equiv 2mk## and ##C \equiv -I_{\phi}^2##, and then$$I_r = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \frac{\sqrt{Ar^2 + Br + C}}{r} dr$$I wonder if there's supposed to be a nice way of solving it, because all I tried was this$$I_r = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \frac{1}{r} \sqrt{A \left(r+ \frac{B}{2A} \right)^2 + \left(\frac{C}{A} - \frac{B^2}{4A^2} \right)} dr = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{u(r_{\text{min}})}^{u(r_{\text{max}})} \frac{\sqrt{Au^2 + D}}{u - \frac{B}{2A}} du$$with ##D \equiv \left(\frac{C}{A} - \frac{B^2}{4A^2} \right)##, which does not seem to help. Maybe I could let ##u \equiv \sqrt{D/A} \sinh{\theta}##, in which case$$I_r = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{\theta(r_{\text{min}})}^{\theta(r_{\text{max}})} \frac{\sqrt{Au^2 + D}}{u - \frac{B}{2A}} du = \frac{D}{\pi \sqrt{A}} \int_{\theta(r_{\text{min}})}^{\theta(r_{\text{max}})} \frac{\cosh^2{\theta}}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{D}} \sinh{\theta} - \frac{B}{2A}} d\theta$$but this just gets messier and messier. Is there a trick or something that would make the integral easier? Thank you in advance

EDIT: By the way, I forgot to write that also we're told that a useful result is$$\int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{min}}} \sqrt{ \left(1-\frac{r_{\text{min}}}{r} \right) \left(\frac{r_{\text{max}}}{r} - 1 \right) } dr = \frac{\pi}{2}(r_{\text{min}} + r_{\text{max}}) - \pi \sqrt{r_{\text{min}}r_{\text{max}}}$$although it's not obvious to me at all how that helps...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
$$I_r = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \frac{\sqrt{Ar^2 + Br + C}}{r} dr$$

##r_\text{min}## and ##r_\text{max}## correspond to the roots of the argument of the square root in the integrand. Thus, the argument may factored to be proportional to ##(r - r_{\text{max}})(r - r_{\text{min}})##. Be careful with signs. For example, ##A## is a negative number.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and etotheipi
Ah perfect, that's the key insight! I suppose that would be because the roots of ##p_{r} = m\dot{r} = 0## correspond to ##r = r_{\text{max}}## and ##r = r_{\text{min}}## because these two are the local maximum and minimum with respect to ##t## in the coordinate ##r = r(t)##. So, using a funny letter for the proportionality constant to keep things interesting,$$2mEr^2 + 2mkr - I_{\phi}^2 = \Xi(r-r_{\text{min}})(r-r_{\text{max}}) = \Xi r^2 - \Xi(r_{\text{min}} + r_{\text{max}}) r+ \Xi r_{\text{min}} r_{\text{max}}$$Since ##r^2##, ##r## and ##1## are linearly independent functions and this holds for all ##r \in [r_{\text{min}}, r_{\text{max}}]## we have ##\Xi = 2mE = (-2mk)/(r_{\text{min}} + r_{\text{max}}) = (-I_{\phi}^2)/(r_{\text{min}} r_{\text{max}})##, which we keep for later. Back to the integral, since ##|r- r_{\text{max}}| = r_{\text{max}} -r \geq 0##,$$I_r = \frac{\sqrt{|\Xi|}}{\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \frac{1}{r} \sqrt{|(r-r_{\text{min}})(r-r_{\text{max}})|} dr = \frac{\sqrt{|\Xi|}}{\pi} \int_{r_{\text{min}}}^{r_{\text{max}}} \sqrt{\left(1-\frac{r_{\text{min}}}{r}\right) \left(\frac{r_{\text{max}}}{r} -1 \right)} dr$$And using the magic hint$$I_r = \frac{\sqrt{|\Xi|}}{\pi} \left(\frac{\pi}{2}(r_{\text{min}} + r_{\text{max}}) - \pi \sqrt{r_{\text{min}}r_{\text{max}}} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{|\Xi|}}{2}\left( r_{\text{min}} + r_{\text{max}}\right) - \sqrt{|\Xi| r_{\text{min}}r_{\text{max}} }$$and after a little more re-writing, and remembering that ##\Xi = - |\Xi| < 0##, as well as that ##E = -|E| < 0## and ##I_{\phi} = |I_{\phi}| > 0##,$$I_r = \frac{\sqrt{-2mE}}{2} \frac{-2mk}{2mE} - \sqrt{I_{\phi}^2} = k\sqrt{\frac{m}{2|E|}} - I_{\phi}$$Hence the Hamiltonian takes the form$$H = -\frac{mk^2}{2(I_r + I_{\phi})^2}$$which is symmetric in the two action variables, and thus the rate of change of both of the corresponding angle variables are equal, i.e. $$\dot{\theta}_r = \frac{\partial H}{\partial I_r} \equiv \frac{\partial H}{\partial I_{\phi}} = \dot{\theta}_{\phi}$$and since the frequencies of both of these variables in the phase space are the same, the orbit is closed.

Thanks you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K