Comparing image sizes of the hotter stars with the cooler stars

AI Thread Summary
Hotter stars do not consistently appear larger than cooler stars in images, as their apparent size depends on factors like distance and angular size rather than temperature alone. The B-V color index indicates that hotter stars have lower values, while cooler stars have higher values, affecting their brightness and flux of energy. The actual size of a star in an image is determined by its angular size, which is influenced by its distance from Earth. Without context about the specific images being compared, it's challenging to draw definitive conclusions. Understanding these factors is essential for accurately interpreting stellar sizes in images.
James Beedy
Messages
6
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


When comparing image sizes of the hotter stars with the cooler stars, do hotter stars consistently appear larger in one image and cooler stars consistently appear smaller in the other image? Why or why not?

Homework Equations


Stellar Spectra Classification[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution

: I understand during a stellar spectra classification, [/B]
A hot star has a B-V color index close to 0 or negative, while a cool star has a B-V color index close to 2.0. Other stars are somewhere in between. The flux of energy passing through the filter tells you the magnitude (brightness) at the wavelength of the filter. It would be my opinion that it would depend on the stars color index and flux of energy that if the stars hot or cold would continually stay the same size. However, I’m not sure if this is how it really is or if I’m missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I need help with solving the above initial question or problem. Thanks!
 
What determines the size of an object in an image? How large are stars and how far away are they? Translate this into the angular size of stars, and from the angular size, calculate the size of a star in an image. This should answer your question.
 
It sounds to me as though the question is posed in some context that is missing from the thread. What images?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top