Comparing Indian High School Syllabus to MIT Lectures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion compares the Indian high school syllabus with MIT lecture content, particularly focusing on Walter Lewin's physics lectures. Indian high school students find these lectures accessible, suggesting that the Indian curriculum is rigorous and covers topics in greater detail. The introductory nature of MIT lectures is highlighted, indicating they are designed for students without a strong physics background. The conversation also notes that not all students at MIT have a physics background, which affects their ability to engage with these lectures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of high school physics concepts
  • Familiarity with introductory physics courses
  • Knowledge of the educational systems in India and the US
  • Awareness of notable physics educators, such as Walter Lewin and Leonard Susskind
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Indian high school physics curriculum
  • Explore Walter Lewin's physics lectures on YouTube
  • Investigate the differences in educational rigor between countries
  • Learn about the structure of introductory physics courses at MIT
USEFUL FOR

High school students, educators, and anyone interested in comparing international educational standards in physics.

kini.Amith
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
I have seen some MIT lecture videos on you tube.i am a high school student of India and i can easily follow most of topics covered in these lectures. In fact we learn many of the topics in greater detail in high schools here in india.
Is this because the indian syllabus is rigorous or is this the case everywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the lectures are thought for students of a lower level or they are general introductory and students are supposed do the more rigorous stuff by themselves.
 
kini.Amith said:
I have seen some MIT lecture videos on you tube.

Watch some more before you comment. I am assuming you have seen Walter Lewin's course.

i am a high school student of India and i can easily follow most of topics covered in these lectures.

These lectures are at a very basic level.

Is this because the indian syllabus is rigorous or is this the case everywhere?

Good high school students across the globe should be able to follow these lectures. Again, I still assume you have watched Walter Lewin's series.
 
yes, i watched only walter lewin's, and i have watched many of them. Is it because they are basic that they are included on youtube?
 
I think a lot of foreigners have a more rigorous curriculim then the US. That is why I am jealous. I think most countries have students take multiple sciences starting in middle school. I am jealous I have a lot of people from India and the like and in my intro classes it was all review.

At the end of the day everyone ends up in the same spot...

Our education system sucks on the whole not all the fault lies on the teachers plenty of blame to go around
 
A bit also depends on what grade you are. If you are near the end of your high school career and have taken physics, those lectures should be on par with your knowledge. If you are a freshman, you are probably ahead of the curve. The introductory lectures are exactly that, introductory.

Moreover, in our system (as well as yours, perhaps?) physics is not mandatory. Thus, introductory physics courses do not assume any background in physics. Most don't assume any knowledge of calculus either. They just teach you the chain rule and don't do anything more complicated.

In our system, a typical high school student who has taken physics should know the stuff in the Lewin lectures. A lot of students (especially at MIT) would have had high school courses far more rigorous. But not every student has had physics. In our system, if you have had physics in high school, you can test out of the introductory lectures. And at many schools they offer an algebra based course, a calculus based course, and an honors course (aimed at physics majors with a VERY strong background).

Hope that helps!
 
kini.Amith said:
yes, i watched only walter lewin's, and i have watched many of them. Is it because they are basic that they are included on youtube?

No. For example you can see the videos of the professor Susskind. (Classical Mechanics, Relativity, etc.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
14K