Comparing Lab Results to Theory: Equipotential Lines Analysis

Click For Summary
The lab results from measuring voltage on a conductive paper with dipole electrodes show a discrepancy compared to theoretical values, with all measured voltages being positive. This contrasts with the theory, which indicates that only half of the equipotential lines should be positive. Possible explanations for this difference include insufficient battery power to create a larger potential difference or the conductive paper's material properties affecting the results. The participant seeks guidance from a professor or TA to understand and resolve the issue. Addressing these discrepancies is crucial for aligning experimental outcomes with theoretical expectations.
cy19861126
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Okay, we are supposed to do a lab in class and compare it to the real results. However, for some reason, my lab result is very different from my theoretical value.

The lab is like this: I put a sheet of conductive paper with the dipole electrodes, one positive and one negative, of course. I connected the two electrodes to a battery by clip-leads. Also, I connected the Voltmeter to the two pins on the electrodes, I connected one of the wires from Voltmeter to the negative electrodes and one another (positive) to various places on the conductive sheet. In the lab, the two electrodes are points. Therefore, this is a situation of two point charges.

After I placed the positive probes on various places and measured the voltage on a 0.5V increments, I drew the lab result. The shape of the result is fine; it is almost exactly like what you would fine on a topography, but what I'm concerned about are the numbers. The voltage numbers all came out to be positive, while from the theory, only half of the equipotential lines are positive (the half that is close to the positve side).

If you want to know what the theory would look like, you can go to: http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phet/simulations/chargesandfields/ChargesAndFields.swf. The way to use this is to drag 1nC to the top of the page and -1nC to the bottom of the page. And on the lower left hand corner, try and plot different equipotential lines. Remember to click on "show numbers" on the lower right hand corner
 
Physics news on Phys.org
before plotting the lines. There could be a couple of factors that could explain why this might be the case. The first could be that the battery I used in the lab wasn't powerful enough to create a larger potential difference, thus the numbers all appeared to be positive. The second is that the conductive paper I used in the lab wasn't thick enough, or it wasn't made out of material that allows for a large potential difference. It would be helpful to have some guidance from my professor or TA in order to understand why this discrepancy is happening and what I can do to solve the problem.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K