Comparing Two Simple Sets: Differentiating with Consistent Logic

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Given a set of one element, and a set of two elements each like that of the first, is it possible to differentiate between the two sets using consistent logic to describe both the sets and their differentiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
{a} = {b, c} if and only if a = b and a = c.


You could talk about a different kind of thing: a multiset, for which [a] and [a,a] are different. (But, [a,b] and [b,a] are the same) But a multiset is generally not a set.

If you further want (a,b) and (b,a) to be different, you want to speak about ordered lists.
 
Hurkyl,

I was surmising that the concept of unity or duality itself is "incompatible" with the actual transformation from unity to duality. Perhaps this idea is too philosophical for the Mathematics forum?
 
*shrug* It all depends on if you can ask your question in a mathematical form. You can't really apply any sort of deductive logic to your question unless you first provide some premises from which one can argue. (e.g. what sort of properties shall we assume "unity" has? And what exactly is a transformation from "unity" to "duality", and which one are you talking about?)