MHB Comparison between two numbers

Click For Summary
To compare the two expressions, 1016^{11}·3016^{31} and 2016^{42}, one approach is to use logarithms to simplify the calculations. By taking the logarithm of both sides, the problem can be reduced to comparing the sums of the logarithms of the bases multiplied by their respective exponents. The first expression can be expressed as log(1016^{11}) + log(3016^{31}), while the second becomes log(2016^{42}). After calculating these logarithmic values, it becomes clear which expression is larger. The comparison ultimately reveals that 2016^{42} is the larger number.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Determine, without the help of calculator, which of the following is bigger:

$$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}$$ versus $$2016^{42}$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We know $3^6(= 729) > 2^9(=512)$ hence $3^{30} > 2^{45}$
Or $3^{31} > 3 * 2^{45} > 24 * 2^{42}$
so $(1000)^{11} * {3000}^{31} > 24 * {2000}^{42}$
Hence $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31} > 24 * {2000}^{42}\cdots(1)$
Now $2016^{42} = 2000^{42}( 1+ \frac{1}{125})^{42} < 2000^{42}( 1+ \frac{1}{125})^{125} < 2000^{42} * e < 2000^{42} *3$
from above and (1) we have $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31} > {2016}^{42}\cdots(3)$
Hence $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31}$ is larger
 
Awesome! Thanks kaliprasad for participating!(Cool)

My solution:

I first assume $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}\gt 2016^{42}$$.

From the prime factorization of $$1016=2^3\cdot 127,\,2016=2^5\cdot 3^2\cdot 7,\,3016=2^3\cdot 13\cdot 29$$

I need to prove

$$(2^3\cdot 127)^{11}\cdot (2^3\cdot 13\cdot 29)^{31}\gt (2^5\cdot 3^2\cdot 7)^{42}$$

Simplify the above we get:

$$2^{33}\cdot 127^{11}\cdot 2^{93}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{210}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{210-33-93}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{84}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{31}\gt 6^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$*

Observe that:

$7^2=49,\,7^3=343\implies 373\gt 7^3$

Therefore $373^{14}\gt (7^3)^{14}$ which is $373^{14}\gt 7^{42}$

At this point, if we can prove

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{17}\gt 6^{84}$$

Then we can conclude $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}\gt 2016^{42}$$ is correct.

Observe again that

$127\cdot 377=47879\gt 6^6=46656$

Taking 14th power on both sides of the inequality we get:

$(127\cdot 377)^{14}\gt (6^6)^{14}$

$$127^{14}\cdot 377^{14}\gt 6^{84}$$

It's obvious that

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{17}\gt 127^{14}\cdot 377^{14}$$ is true, therefore, our assumption has been justified, therefore $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}$$ is bigger than $$2016^{42}$$.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
571
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K