MHB Comparison between two numbers

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Determine, without the help of calculator, which of the following is bigger:

$$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}$$ versus $$2016^{42}$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We know $3^6(= 729) > 2^9(=512)$ hence $3^{30} > 2^{45}$
Or $3^{31} > 3 * 2^{45} > 24 * 2^{42}$
so $(1000)^{11} * {3000}^{31} > 24 * {2000}^{42}$
Hence $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31} > 24 * {2000}^{42}\cdots(1)$
Now $2016^{42} = 2000^{42}( 1+ \frac{1}{125})^{42} < 2000^{42}( 1+ \frac{1}{125})^{125} < 2000^{42} * e < 2000^{42} *3$
from above and (1) we have $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31} > {2016}^{42}\cdots(3)$
Hence $(1016)^{11} * {3016}^{31}$ is larger
 
Awesome! Thanks kaliprasad for participating!(Cool)

My solution:

I first assume $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}\gt 2016^{42}$$.

From the prime factorization of $$1016=2^3\cdot 127,\,2016=2^5\cdot 3^2\cdot 7,\,3016=2^3\cdot 13\cdot 29$$

I need to prove

$$(2^3\cdot 127)^{11}\cdot (2^3\cdot 13\cdot 29)^{31}\gt (2^5\cdot 3^2\cdot 7)^{42}$$

Simplify the above we get:

$$2^{33}\cdot 127^{11}\cdot 2^{93}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{210}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{210-33-93}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 13^{31}\cdot 29^{31}\gt 2^{84}\cdot 3^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{31}\gt 6^{84}\cdot 7^{42}$$*

Observe that:

$7^2=49,\,7^3=343\implies 373\gt 7^3$

Therefore $373^{14}\gt (7^3)^{14}$ which is $373^{14}\gt 7^{42}$

At this point, if we can prove

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{17}\gt 6^{84}$$

Then we can conclude $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}\gt 2016^{42}$$ is correct.

Observe again that

$127\cdot 377=47879\gt 6^6=46656$

Taking 14th power on both sides of the inequality we get:

$(127\cdot 377)^{14}\gt (6^6)^{14}$

$$127^{14}\cdot 377^{14}\gt 6^{84}$$

It's obvious that

$$127^{11}\cdot 377^{17}\gt 127^{14}\cdot 377^{14}$$ is true, therefore, our assumption has been justified, therefore $$1016^{11}\cdot 3016^{31}$$ is bigger than $$2016^{42}$$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top