Compatibility of Physics and Abstract Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by undergraduate physics majors when studying abstract algebra, specifically using the textbook 'Contemporary Abstract Algebra' by Joseph Gallian. Participants noted a common struggle with the subject's abstract nature, contrasting it with more familiar topics like multivariable calculus and partial differential equations (PDEs). The conversation highlights the necessity of adapting to a different way of thinking, focusing on structures rather than functions. Suggestions include using concrete examples to better understand key concepts, which are foundational for advanced topics in quantum field theory (QFT), cosmology, and crystallography.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic structures such as groups and rings
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus and partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory (QFT) and cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore concrete examples of abstract algebra concepts to enhance understanding
  • Study the fundamentals of group theory and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between abstract algebra and quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Learn about symmetry groups in crystallography and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics majors, mathematics students struggling with abstract algebra, educators seeking to bridge the gap between abstract concepts and practical applications, and anyone interested in the foundational role of abstract algebra in advanced scientific theories.

TRB8985
Messages
74
Reaction score
15
One of the last classes I'm taking before finishing my degrees as an undergraduate is abstract algebra. My professor uses the textbook 'Contemporary Abstract Algebra' by Joseph Gallian. The book isn't written terribly nor is the teacher a poor one, but I just find this subject so uncharacteristically challenging compared to all other math experiences I've had up until this point.

I've shared my experience with a couple professors from my physics department, whose specialties lie in heavy-ion physics, lasers, and mathematical physics, and they all seemed to share a common trait of also having difficulty in this subject at an undergraduate level.

This had me curious - do most undergraduate physics majors also have difficulty with this course?

It feels like there's just something uniquely difficult about this subject compared to, say, multivariable calculus or a PDE course. The content is so monumentally boring and so far-removed from anything familiar that even mustering up the energy to do the homework is like pulling teeth, which is funny, because I really do enjoy physics and mathematics.

Has anyone else had this experience? Do you have any suggestions? Thank you for your input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way of thinking is a different one. Whereas you seem to be accustomed to think in terms of functions, the thinking here is along structures. And as always a change of habit is a difficulty per se. I had a look at the content of the book and to me, these are all simple basics, like Newton's mechanics would be for physicists. It apparently doesn't contain any advanced things as Galois theory, spectral theory or any other more interesting subjects. However, if it happens that you will be interested in QFT or cosmolgy or crystallography someday, those fundamentals are the basic language for Lie theory (QFT), algebraic varieties and topological invariants (cosmology), and symmetry groups (cristallography).
 
Abstract algebra is a very different beast. My only advice is to try to arm yourself with good examples of all the key concepts to try to anchor the abstraction in concrete examples.

Even though I studied pure maths, I was generally much happier with analysis and linear algebra. Group theory never caught my imagination.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K