MHB Completion of the proof of the Cosine Rule

Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Hello my friends,

I posted this picture as a proof of the Cosine Rule in another thread,

cosinerule_zps33b193fb.jpg


however after having a closer look at it, I believe it is incomplete. It works by drawing a segment from one of the vertices so that this segment is perpendicular to one side of the triangle, and then applying Pythagoras' Theorem.

However, if you have an obtuse-angled triangle, it is impossible to draw a segment from one of the acute vertices to make a right-angle triangle. So how is it possible to prove this relationship:

[math]\displaystyle c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2\,a\,b\cos{(C)}[/math]

when C is an obtuse angle?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please refer to the following diagram:

View attachment 867

Note: I have used $$\sin(\pi-\theta)=\sin(\theta)$$ and $$\cos(\pi-\theta)=-\cos(\theta)$$.

By Pythagoras, we now have:

$$(a-b\cos(\theta))^2+(b\sin(\theta))^2=c^2$$

$$c^2=a^2-2ab\cos(\theta)+b^2\cos^2(\theta)+b^2\sin^2(\theta)$$

$$c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\cos(\theta)$$
 

Attachments

  • proveit.jpg
    proveit.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 104
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top