Complex analysis book with lots of solved problems?

Click For Summary
For those struggling with complex analysis concepts, several textbooks with ample solved problems are recommended. "Complex Analysis" by Serge Lang, along with its solution book by Rami Shakarchi, is highlighted as a strong choice. "Schaum's Outline of Complex Variables" is also suggested for its problem-solving approach. Additionally, "Problems and Theorems in Analysis II" by George Polya and Gabor Szegö offers challenging problems, while "A Collection of Problems on Complex Analysis" by Volkovyskii Lunts and Aramanovich is noted, though it has fewer solutions. Engaging with these resources can enhance understanding through practical problem-solving.
stgermaine
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am taking complex analysis over the summer and I am having a difficult time learning the concepts. I've tried reading several dfiferent textbooks, and though they sometimtes state the same theorem using different wording, different arguments, etc, I am still having a hard time understanding it.

I often learn best when I solve problems that use concepts, but a lot of these textbooks do not have many problems or detailed step by step solutions.

What are some good complex analysis books with many solved problems?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be sure to solve problems on your own before looking at the answers and watch out for mistakes and strange methods.
Complex Analysis by Serge Lang has a solution book Problems and Solutions for Complex Analysis by Rami Shakarchi.
There are some humorous reviews on amazon and

Schaum's Outline of Complex Variables is worth a look.

Problems and Theorems in Analysis II: Theory of Functions. Zeros. Polynomials. Determinants. Number Theory. Geometry by George Polya and Gabor Szegö is a classic, the problems are hard though. I forget which volume has most of the complex analysis stuff.

There are many more choices without many solved problemssuch as A Collection of Problems on Complex Analysis by Volkovyskii Lunts, and Aramanovich.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K